SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Afnan Rahees - Appellant
Versus
North Delhi Municipal Corporation - Respondent
W.P.(C) 3195 of 2022 & CM Appls. 9287-88 of 2022
Decided On : 21-02-2022




Subsequent purchasers have rights to challenge unlawful administrative actions, and temporary relief can be granted to allow further appeals.

Headnote:(A) Delhi Municipal Corporation Act - Section related to unauthorized construction - Petitioner sought directions to prevent coercive action against shops due to alleged unauthorized construction. Court noted that demolition and sealing orders were already in place and action was taken for violations since 2017. (Paras 2-6)

(B) Regularization Applications - Subsequent purchasers have the right to challenge administrative actions affecting properties purchased. The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition while reserving the right to file an appeal regarding the regularization of the property. (Paras 9-10)

(C) Interim Protection - The orders provide for temporary relief preventing coercive action for 10 days to allow the petitioner to seek remedy from the Appellate Tribunal. (Paras 11-12)

(D) Dismissal - Petition dismissed as withdrawn, with rights reserved for further appeal.

Table of Content
1. request for non-coercive action during application process. (Para 2 , 3)
2. details on unauthorized construction and actions taken. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. right of petitioner to receive orders and withdraw petition. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. temporary protection against coercive action outlined. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)--The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents not to take any coercive action against the shops of the petitioners being shop Nos.56 & 59 on ground floor of property No.56-61 Chatta Lal Miyan, Fasil Road, Delhi Gate, Delhi.

3. Further petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents not to take any coercive action till disposal of the regularization application, if moved with the Corporation.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that action has been taken as there was unuauthorised construction noticed from ground floor upto the fifth floor. He submits that part demolition action qua fourth and fifth floor has already been taken and further action in accordance with law is being contemplated against the subject property.

5. He submits that this property has been booked as far back as on 06.01.2017 for deviation/excess coverage at inter-alia the ground floor.

6. Learned counsel submits that demolition order and sealing order have been passed in respect of the subject property and vacation notice has also been given. He further submits that the action of the Corporation would be appealable before the Appellate Tribunal, MCD.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since petitioner is a subsequent purchaser he has not received copies of the sealing order or demolition order.

8. Let copies of the demolition and sealing order be furnished to the petitioner through counsel within two days.

9. Learned counsel for the petitioner accordingly seeks leave to withdraw the petition reserving the right of the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, MCD and also to approach the Corporation for regularization/compounding of the alleged unauthorized construction.

10. The Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. All rights and contentions are reserved.

11. It is however, directed that for a period of 10 days from service of the demolition and sealing order, no coercive action be taken against the shops of the petitioner referred to hereinabove to enable the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, MCD.

12. It is clarified that this protection shall enure to the benefit of the petitioner for a period of 10 days after supply of copy of the said orders or till the time the petitioner approaches the Appellate Tribunal, MCD whichever is earlier.

13. The continuance of interim protection thereafter shall be subject to orders to be passed by the Appellate Tribunal, MCD, if any.

14. Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email by the Court Master.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top