Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports – Appellant
Versus
Agility Logistic Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the arbitration case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 2. arguments regarding breach of exclusivity and jurisdiction. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 3. court's reasoning on exclusivity rights and breach. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 4. conclusion dismissing the petition. (Para 50 , 51) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. The Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports (hereinafter `MYAS') has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter `the A&C Act') impugning an Arbitral Award dated 29.10.2018 (hereinafter `the impugned award') delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of three members-Justice (Retd.) Shri R.C. Lahoti, Justice (Retd.) Shri D.P. Wadhwa, and Justice (Retd.) Shri S.C. Agrawal as the Presiding Arbitrator (hereinafter `the Arbitral Tribunal').
2. The impugned award was delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal in respect of disputes that had arisen between the parties in connection with the Logistics Service Provider Sponsorship and Services Agreement dated
The exclusive rights of a logistics service provider under an agreement for an event encompass both VIK and non-VIK services, obliging the event organizer to provide an opportunity for the provider t....
Termination of a contractual agreement during a lock-in period is invalid unless justified under specific contractual provisions, emphasizing the need to adhere to agreed terms for contract terminati....
Court highlighted that interference with arbitral awards is limited, asserting that awards cannot be set aside merely due to merits but only if arbitrary, confirming the Arbitral Tribunal's authority....
An expulsion under a contract must have legitimate causes, and unjustified actions by one party render such expulsion illegal, reaffirming constraints under arbitration frameworks.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the notice under Section 21 of the A&C Act must be received for the arbitration to commence, claims must be initiated within the limitation pe....
The limited scope of judicial review under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 confirms that existence of an arbitration agreement alone is examined, without delving into the meri....
The Arbitral Tribunal's interpretation of contract terms must be reasonable, and interest on interest is impermissible under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The court ruled that a notice invoking arbitration is deemed served if dispatched to the correct address, and disputes cannot be dismissed on limitation grounds when evidence suggests ongoing acknowl....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the decision of the Arbitral Tribunal must be based on evidence and material on record, and the Court will not interfere with the award unless....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
