SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Alstom Systems India Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Zillion Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

(By video conference on account of COVID-19)

OMP (COMM) 351/2021

1. The petitioner assails, by means of this petition, preferred under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("1996 Act"), order dated 29th October 2021, passed by a learned three member Arbitral Tribunal, presently in seisin of the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent.

The impugned order

2. The impugned order came to be passed on an application by the petitioner, as the respondent before the learned Arbitral Tribunal, under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), seeking dismissal of the respondent's case as being barred by time. To support this request, the petitioner furnished, to the learned Arbitral Tribunal the following tabular statement of dates, reproduced verbatim from para 2 of the impugned order:

24.09.2015Claimant and Respondent entered into a sub-contract.
16.09.2016The Respondent terminated the sub-contract.
21.09.2016Termination letter was delivered to the Claimant.
21.09.2016The Claimant raised a dispute stating that termination is illegal.
07.10.2016Invocation of Bank Guarantees by the Respondent.
07.02.2017Bank Guarantees encashed and mone

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top