Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Rajesh Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh Gupta – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of appeal and parameters for arbitration. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background regarding family settlements. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. arguments regarding the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. details of counter-claims and their rejection due to lack of cause. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. analysis of counter-claims and merits of claims. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. court's examination of connection with family settlements. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 7. claims for specific performance and delay in litigation. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 8. court's dismissal of appeal and affirmation of arbitral tribunal's decisions. (Para 32 , 33) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. The appellants have filed the present appeal under Section 37(2)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter `the A&C Act'), impugning orders dated 22.07.2020 and 24.06.2021 (hereafter `the impugned orders') passed by the Arbitral Tribunal.
2. The appellants' challenge to the impugned order dated 22.07.2020 is confined to the findings of the Arbitral Tribunal that no cause of action had arisen for the appellants in respect of certain counter-claims (referred t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
