Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Gail (India) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Triveni Engineering & Industries Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural context of arbitration (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 28) |
| 2. delays and extensions of time (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. finalization and verification of works (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. contentions raised by gail (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 5. assessment of bank charges and prs (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 40 , 56 , 57) |
| 6. justification of the arbitral tribunal's award (Para 39 , 44 , 58) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. The petitioner (hereinafter `GAIL') has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter `the A&C Act') impugning an arbitral award dated 20.11.2019 (hereinafter `the impugned award') rendered by an Arbitral Tribunal comprising of a former Chief Justice of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir as the Sole Arbitrator (hereinafter `the Arbitral Tribunal')
2. The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that have arisen between the parties in connection with an agreement dated 28.05.2012 (hereinafter the `Agreement').
3. The controversy in the present case arises in the following context:
4. Tenders were invited by GAIL (being Tender no. A09
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
