SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Shree Vardhman Infrahome Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Swadesh Kumar – Respondent


Table of Content
1. legal basis for petitions under article 227 (Para 1 , 1)
2. order and settlement agreement details (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
3. force majeure clause in apartment buyer agreements (Para 6 , 7)
4. notification of force majeure conditions (Para 8 , 9)
5. execution petition filed for breach (Para 10 , 11)
6. arguments concerning force majeure (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
7. court examination of the force majeure claim (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
8. remand of case for reconsideration due to oversight (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
9. clarification of the scope of remand (Para 22 , 23)
10. final orders and direction for next steps (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. These petitions, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assail order dated 25th April, 2022 passed by the learned National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ("the learned NCDRC") in a batch of execution applications, seeking execution of the order dated 15th January, 2019, passed by the learned NCRDC in Consumer Case 1893/2017 (Flora Welfare Association v. Shree Vardhman Infrahome Pvt. Ltd.).

Order dated 15th January, 2019 and the Settlement Agreement

2. The order dated 15th January, 2019 reads thus:

    "The matter h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top