IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Saurabh Banerjee, JJ.
Deewan Singh - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 8063 of 2022
Decided On : 02-06-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to challenge medical examination results. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner argues for reevaluation of his medical fitness. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. court orders examination by a new medical board. (Para 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. decision of medical board shall be final. (Para 6 , 9) |
1. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks setting aside of the Medical Examination dated 05.08.2021 and the Review Medical Examination dated 11.08.2021; directions to respondents to get the medical examination of his eyes done in the All India Institute of Medical Sciences or Safdarjang Hospital or any other government hospital or special medical board, to recruit the petitioner for the post of Constable in I.T.B.P, in case he is found fit in the medical examination; directions to respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service from the date when the Constables of the batch of the petitioner in which he had applied with all consequential service and monetary benefits.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had participated in recruitment process for the post of Constable/Tradesman 2017 in ITBP and had qualified in written examination held at New Delhi. It is further submitted that physical examination of the petitioner was held at Jabalpur and tradesman test at Jodhpur. Thereafter, the petitioner was called for medical examination at Composite Hospital ITBP, Chandigarh on 04.08.2021 and on 05.08.2021, he was declared unfit for Defective Distance Vision with observation Rt 6/36, Lt 6/12. The medical review board in the medical examination report dated 11.08.2021 also declared the petitioner unfit for the reason "Defective Distant Vision with observation of R 6/36, L6/24".
3. Case of the petitioner is that the petitioner made representation dated 13.09.2021 to DIG, ITBP submitting that in view of the opinion of the specialist Dr. Vishwas Gupta, Chief Specialist Eyes of Govt., Satelite Hospital, Banipark, Jaipur, the opinion of the Medical Board dated 05.08.2021 and Review Medical Board dated 11.08.2021 be set aside. The representation of the petitioner was rejected vide Letter dated 29.09.2021 by DIG, Personnel & Administrative, Northern Frontier Headquarter, ITBP on the ground that as per directions of the Ministry of Home Affairs, there was no provision of medical examination after Review Medical Examination. Thereafter, the petitioner visited New Delhi and got himself examined in Rajendra Prasad Eye Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi on 11.11.2021 where the vision of the petitioner was opined as VA 6/6, 6/6. Thus, the present petition.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be referred to some independent hospital and his eye be tested again and in case, the petitioner is found fit, he be directed to join further selection process for the post of Constable/Tradesman 2017 in ITBP.
5. Notice issued.
6. Learned Senior Panel Counsel for respondents accepts notice and submits that there is no provision of medical examination after Review Medical Examination.
7. In view of aforesaid facts as well as in the interest of justice, we hereby dispose of the present writ petition by directing the respondents to facilitate the constitution of a fresh Medical Board at the Army Hospital (R&R), New Delhi for conducting fresh examination of the petitioner within two weeks from today. If the petitioner is found fit by the aforesaid Medical Board, he may be permitted to join in the further selection process. However, if the petitioner is found unfit by the aforesaid Medical Board, he will not be granted any further opportunity to get examined again.
8. As admitted by learned counsel for the petitioner, it is made clear that the decision of the aforesaid Medical Board shall be final and binding.
9. Copy of this order be transmitted to Incharge, R&R Hospital, New Delhi for information and necessary compliance.
A fresh medical examination must be conducted to ensure fair recruitment practices, with the decision of the new Medical Board being final and binding.
The court upheld the principle of fair assessment by directing an independent medical board to evaluate the petitioner's fitness, reinforcing the right to equality and fair treatment in employment pr....
The court affirmed the necessity of fair re-evaluation in recruitment processes when discrepancies in medical fitness findings arise.
The decisions of a Review Medical Board in recruitment processes are final and can only be challenged under exceptional circumstances, such as procedural violations or malafides.
The opinion of the medical authorities of the Forces is crucial in determining the fitness of a candidate for recruitment.
The court has the authority to order a re-examination by an independent Medical Board and make decisions based on the findings of the re-examination.
In cases of conflicting medical opinions, the court may direct the constitution of a Medical Board to assess the petitioner's medical condition, with the board's report being final and binding if the....
The need for a conclusive medical assessment by a Medical Board to determine fitness for further selection process.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.