SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(HP) 771

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
A.A. Sayed, Jyotsna Rewal Dua, JJ.
Mr. Divyaish Singh Chouhan - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. - Respondents
CWP No. 2415 of 2022
Decided On : 08-12-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Lovneesh Kanwar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Additional Advocate General, Mr. Dinesh Thakur, Advocate, Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate, Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate

Point of Law: Vacancy is created either because of non-allocation of seat or candidate not taking admission on allocated seat.

Headnote:

Redraw Admission - Upgradation of Course Seat - Seeks a direction to respondents to redraw merit for admission to MBBS course in mop-up round of counselling against seats of H.P. State Quota - Prayer is for upgradation of his MBBS course seat from Management Quota to H.P. State Quota (Scheduled Cast) category in respondent No.5 – If a candidate is satisfied with seat allotted to him, he need not then participate in subsequent round of counselling - Para 4.

Finding of the Court:

Vacancy position cannot re-adjusted by respondents on their own in every round of counselling - Clause 9(i) is to be followed only during allocation of vacant seats - Once seat occupied by (respondent No.7) was not available in mop-up round, once seat occupied by petitioner was not available in mop-up round, when Ms. Pragati Panwar & petitioner did not participate in mop-up round of counselling, there was no question of applying Clause 9(i) of Part VIII of prospectus for forcibly shifting Ms. Pragati Panwar from H.P. Quota (SC) seat to H.P. Quota (General) seat - Hence, seat of HP Quota (SC) category was not available in mop-up round of counselling - Petitioner could not be allotted seat occupied by Ms. Pragati Panwar - Process of admissions also stood concluded since long – Court do not find any merit in claim of petitioner for upgradation of his MBBS course seat in respondent No.5-private medical college from Management Quota to H.P. Quota (SC) category.

Result: Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.

Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to redraw the merit for admission to the MBBS course in the mop-up round of counselling held on 25.03.2022 against the seats of H.P. State Quota. In essence, the prayer of the petitioner is for upgradation of his MBBS course seat from Management Quota to H.P. State Quota (Scheduled Cast) category in respondent No.5-Maharishi Markandeshwar Medical College and Hospital, Kumarhatti, District Solan.

2. Following facts are not in dispute :-

2(i) Petitioner appeared in NEET-undergraduate-2021 examination held for the academic session 2021-2022 and secured 407 marks therein. Respondent No.3 issued common/centralized counselling prospectus in December 2021 inviting applications for undergraduate Medical/Dental Courses for admissions based on merit of NEET-UG-2021. The petitioner participated in the counselling. In the State merit-list issued by respondent No.3, he secured 1568th rank.

2(ii) Petitioner remained unsuccessful in the first round of counselling, result of which was declared on 2.2.2022. Provisional seat allotment during second round of counselling was notified on 4.3.2022. Name of the petitioner with 1568th rank was reflected at Serial No.243. He was provisionally allotted Scheduled Cast category seat in H.P. Quota in respondent No.5-college. Ms. Pragati Panwar (respondent No.7) with 929th rank figured at Serial No.194 in this list. She was provisionally allotted General category seat in H.P. Quota in respondent No.5-college. Petitioner and Ms. Pragati Panwar, both belonged to Scheduled Caste (SC) category.

2(iii) Final seat allotment of second round of counselling was notified on 8.3.2022. In this list, one Mr. Raghav Singh with 815th rank figured at Serial No.179. He was allotted General category seat in H.P. Quota in respondent No.5-college. Resultantly, Ms. Pragati Panwar with 929th rank got shifted to serial No.198 in H.P. Quota Scheduled Caste category seat in respondent No.5-college. Consequently, the petitioner was allotted Management Quota seat (General) in respondent No-5-college. The allotment letter for MBBS/BDS Course Session 2021-22 was issued to the petitioner on 08.03.2022. The petitioner took admission in Management Quota (General) seat in respondent No.5-college and deposited the requisite fee.

2(iv) On 23.3.2022 respondent No.3 displayed vacancy position for mop-up round of counselling in respondent No.5-college. There were total 244 vacant seats out of which 4 were in H.P. Quota. In these 4 seats falling to H.P Quota, three were meant for General and one for the Scheduled Tribe categories. Mop-up round of counselling was held 25.3.2022. Three students namely Ms. Arundhati Sharma (rank 1025), Ms. Shalini Mankotia (rank 1179) and Mr. Mrigank Sood (rank 1199) belonging to General Category and admitted in management quota in second round of counselling, participated and were considered in the mop-up round of counselling against the available seats in H.P. Quota (General) category. Their status was up-graded from Management quota (allotted to them in second round of counselling) to H.P. Quota (General) against the available seats in the mop-up round.

2(v) The grievance of the petitioner is that before upgradation of MBBS seats of the aforesaid three candidates i.e. Ms. Arundhati Sharma, Ms. Shalini Mankotia and Mr. Mrigank Sood (respondent No.6) from Management Quota to H.P. Quota (General), the respondents were required to consider up-gradation of seat held by Ms. Pragati Panwar from H.P. Quota (SC) category to H.P. Quota (General) category against one out of the available three seats. That Ms. Pragati Panwar in view of her over all merit above the aforesaid three candidates was required to be shifted from H.P. Quota (SC) category to H.P. Quota (General) category in the mop-up round. Consequently, the petitioner was also required to be shifted and upgraded from Management Quota to H.P. Quota (SC) category i.e. the seat which would have

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top