SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ.
Louis Dreyfus Company India Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax - Respondent
W.P.(C) 10964 of 2022
Decided On : 22-07-2022




The court affirmed the Respondents' obligation to act promptly on ITAT orders regarding refunds and applicable interest under the Income Tax Act.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 244A and 153(5) - Petition for direction to grant refund and applicable interest - Respondents failed to give effect to ITAT orders concerning Assessment Years 2005-06, 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2011-12 despite multiple representations - Court directed Respondents to issue necessary orders within six weeks without commenting on the merits of the case. (Paras 1-3)

(B) Judicial authority - The court has emphasized the obligation of the Respondents to act promptly in accordance with the law concerning refunds following appellate orders. (Para 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought a direction for the implementation of ITAT orders related to certain assessment years, following which no actions were taken by the Respondents despite the expiry of the stipulated time for compliance.

Findings of Court:
The petition was disposed of with a directive for prompt issuance of consequential orders and refunds.

Issues: Whether the Respondents had a duty to grant refunds per the appellate orders and the necessary interest therein.

Ratio Decidendi: The Respondents are legally obligated to act within the prescribed time frame following ITAT orders as stipulated in the Act.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. direction to respond to itat orders (Para 1)
2. petitioner sought refund due to itat's ruling (Para 2 , 3)
3. notice to respondents accepted (Para 4 , 5)
4. court's direction for compliance (Para 6)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

C.M.No.32021/2022

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) No.10964/2022

W.P.(C) 10964/2022

1. By way of the present petition, Petitioner seeks a direction to the Respondents to give effect to the ITAT orders in relation to the Assessment Years 2005-06, 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2011-12 and grant the refund due to the Petitioner along with applicable interest in terms of Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the `Act')

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the ITR filed by the Petitioner for the Assessment Years 2005-06, 2008-09, 2009-10 and 201112 were subject to tax scrutiny in terms of Section 143(3) of the Act wherein certain additions were made to the returned income in these years. He states that in appeals filed by the Petitioner, the Delhi Bench of Income-tax Appellate Tribunal deleted the additions made to the returned incomes.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner has made several representations to the Respondents for giving effect to the Appellate orders and grant the requisite refund along with the applicable interest. However, he states that the Respondents have not acted upon the same, despite the fact that the period for giving appeal effect in terms of Section 153(5) of the Act i.e. within three months from the end of the month in which Appellate orders are received by Respondent No. 3 has lapsed.

4. Issue notice.

5. Mr.Ajit Sharma, learned Senior Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Respondents.

6. Keeping in view the limited prayer made in the present writ petition, the same is disposed of with a direction to the Respondents to pass the appeal effect orders and issue consequential refunds, if any, along with applicable interest thereon within six weeks. This Court clarifies that it has not commented on the merits of the controversy. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open. List the matter for compliance on 12th October, 2022.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top