SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ.
KRBL Limited - Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 13(1), Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 15067 of 2022
Decided On : 01-11-2022




Tax authorities are mandated to process refunds and pass appeal effect orders within specified timelines, with delays constituting a violation of constitutional rights.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 237, 240, and 244A - Petition for issuing tax refunds and appeal effect orders - Petitioner entitled to refunds amounting to Rs.35,63,56,882/- and Rs.20,36,43,118/- plus interest; respondents have had sufficient time to comply with ITAT directives - Non-issuance of refund violates Article 265 of the Constitution. (Paras 2, 3, and 6)

(B) Administrative action - An appeal effect order must be passed within three months of the ITAT's order. (Para 5)

Facts of the case:
Writ petition filed by the Petitioner seeking issuance of tax refunds due following an ITAT order that deleted prior additions. Petitions for refunds and action were made to the Revenue, which remained unaddressed.

Findings of Court:
The Court directed the Revenue to process the refunds in an expedient manner within six weeks, reaffirming the necessity of adhering to procedural timelines.

Issues: The main concerns were the timeliness of issuing tax refunds and compliance with the ITAT's orders.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court asserted that administrative compliance with ITAT orders is mandatory, and delays result in constitutional violations.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions for refund issuance.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks refund of taxes. (Para 1)
2. refund entitlement post itat order. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's observation on appeal timeline. (Para 4 , 5)
4. direction for issuance of refunds. (Para 6)
5. final decision and timeline for compliance. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 46552/2022 (for exemption)

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 15067/2022

1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondents to issue the refund of Rs.35,63,56,882/- along with up-to-date interest being admittedly due to the Petitioner pursuant to appeal effect order dated 05th April, 2021 arising out of order of CIT(A), pass the appeal effect order pursuant to the ITAT order dated 09th May, 2022 as well as issue additional refund of Rs. 20,36,43,118/- along with up-to-date interest and to release the refund of Rs.60,00,000/- seized at the time of search along with up-to-date interest due to the Petitioner pursuant to the ITAT order dated 09th May, 2022.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the ITAT vide order dated 09th May, 2022, decided all issues in favour of the Petitioner and the entire additions were deleted. She states that the Petitioner is now entitled to a refund of remaining taxes paid under protest amounting to Rs.56,00,00,000/- along with applicable interest under Sections 244A/244A(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act').

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner has filed letters dated 20th May, 2022 and 11th July, 2022 with the Respondents for passing of an appeal effect order pursuant to the ITAT order and also for release of refunds legally due to the Petitioner, but to no avail. She submits that non-issuance of refund is in violation of Article 265 of the Constitution of India and also against Sections 237 and 240 of the Act.

4. Issue notice. Mr.Ajit Sharma, learned senior standing counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Respondents-Revenue. He states that the Revenue is in the process of filing an appeal against the order of the ITAT.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the Respondents-Revenue has had sufficient time to file an appeal against the order of the ITAT. In any event, in accordance with the mandate of law, the appeal effect order has to be passed within three months of passing the appeal order.

6. Keeping in view the limited prayer sought in the present writ petition, the same is disposed of along with the pending application with a direction to the Respondents-Revenue to consider:

(i) Issue of refund of Rs.35,63,56,882/- along with up-to-date interest being due to the Petitioner pursuant to appeal effect order dated 05th April, 2021 arising out of order of CIT(A);

(ii) Passing an appeal effect order pursuant to ITAT order dated 09th May, 2022; and

(iii) Issue of additional refund of Rs.20,36,43,118/- along with up-to-date interest.

7. The necessary appeal effect order and payments of refunds shall be made within a period of six weeks. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top