SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ.
KRBL Limited - Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 13(1), Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 15068 of 2022
Decided On : 01-11-2022




Tax authorities must issue refunds due based on favorable ITAT orders within statutory deadlines, ensuring adherence to constitutional mandates regarding the issuance of refunds.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 237, 240, and 244A - Refund of taxes - Writ petition filed seeking issuance of refunds totaling Rs.15,03,89,270/- and Rs.17,96,10,730/- along with up-to-date interest as per ITAT orders - Non-issuance was claimed to violate Article 265 of the Constitution - Respondents given six weeks to comply with refund order. (Paras 1-7)

(B) Requirement of appeal effect order - Respondents mandated to issue the appeal effect order within three months of the appeal order, ensuring compliance with statutory deadlines. (Para 5)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner sought to recover substantial refund amounts from Respondents, claiming all relevant taxes had been decisively ruled in their favor by the ITAT.

Findings of Court:
The Court acknowledged the propriety of the tax refund requests and the necessity for appropriate action by the Respondents-Revenue within a specified timeframe.

Issues: The principal issue was the delayed issuance of tax refunds due to the Petitioner based on favorable ITAT decisions.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for the issuance of appeal effect orders and the necessity to comply with the Constitution regarding unauthorized tax withholdings.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions for issuance of refunds within six weeks.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks tax refunds. (Para 1)
2. arguments for tax refunds based on itat order. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's observations on the appeal process. (Para 4 , 5)
4. court's direction for immediate action on refunds. (Para 6)
5. conclusion and order to the respondents. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 46553/2022 (for exemption)

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 15068/2022

1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondents to issue the refund of Rs.15,03,89,270/- along with up-to-date interest being admittedly due to the Petitioner pursuant to appeal effect order dated 05th April, 2021 arising out of order of CIT(A), pass the appeal effect order pursuant to ITAT order dated 09th May, 2022 as well as issue additional refund of Rs.17,96,10,730/- along with up-to-date interest and to release the refund of Rs.60,00,000/- seized at the time of search along with up-to-date interest due to the Petitioner pursuant to the ITAT order dated 09th May, 2022.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the ITAT vide order dated 09th May, 2022, decided all issues in favour of the Petitioner and the entire additions were deleted. She states that the Petitioner is now entitled to a refund of remaining taxes paid under protest amounting to Rs.33,00,00,000/- along with applicable interest under Sections 244A/244A(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act').

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner has filed letters dated 20th May, 2022 and 11th July, 2022 with the Respondents for passing of an appeal effect order pursuant to the ITAT order and also for release of refunds legally due to the Petitioner, but to no avail. She submits that non-issuance of refund is in violation of Article 265 of the Constitution of India and also against Sections 237 and 240 of the Act.

4. Issue notice. Mr.Ajit Sharma, learned senior standing counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Respondents-Revenue. He states that the Revenue is in the process of filing an appeal against the order of the ITAT.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the Respondents-Revenue has had sufficient time to file an appeal against the order of the ITAT. In any event, in accordance with the mandate of law, the appeal effect order has to be passed within three months of passing the appeal order.

6. Keeping in view the limited prayer sought in the present writ petition, the same is disposed of along with the pending application with a direction to the Respondents-Revenue to consider:

(i) Issue of refund of Rs.15,03,89,270/- along with up-to-date interest being admittedly due to the Petitioner pursuant to appeal effect order dated 05th April, 2021 arising out of order of CIT(A);

(ii) Passing an appeal effect order pursuant to ITAT order dated 09th May, 2022; and

(iii) Issue additional refund of Rs.17,96,10,730/- along with up-to-date interest.

7. The necessary appeal effect order and payments of refunds shall be made within a period of six weeks. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top