SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
MUFG Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. refund orders sought under specific itat directions. (Para 1)
2. petitioner's grievance over lack of compliance by respondents. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. acknowledgement of respondent's process for issuing refunds. (Para 5)
4. court's order to issue refunds within six weeks. (Para 6)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J.:

1. Present writ petitions have been filed seeking directions to the Respondents to pass orders giving effect to the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (`ITAT') dated 21st May, 2020 and 06th December, 2018, the Assessment order dated 18th March, 2021 as well as the order of the ITAT dated 13th September, 2019 and the order of the Calcutta High Court dated 07th August, 2019 and issue consequential refund of Rs.58,32,30,038/, Rs.11,14,54,207/-, Rs.13,89,08,987/-, Rs.8,11,44,800/-and Rs.1,94,65,800/for the Assessment Years 2009-10, 1996-97, 2016-17, 2001-02 and 1991-92 with interest under Section 244A(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act') and additional interest under section 244(1A) of the Act.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Respondents have failed to pass orders giving effect to the orders of the ITAT and the High Court without givi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top