SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
KRBL Limited – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. writ petition filed for income tax refund. (Para 1)
2. claim for refund based on itat order. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's view on time for appeal. (Para 4 , 5)
4. direction for refund processing. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J.:

C.M.No.44725/2022

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) No.14590/2022

1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondents to pass the appeal effect order pursuant to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (` ITAT') order dated 09th May, 2022 and to issue refund of Rs.11,56,81,040/-along with up-to-date interest as well as issue short interest of Rs.1,74,91,170/-received from the Respondents after giving effect to the order of CIT(A) for the Assessment Year 2010-11 and to release the refund of Rs. 60,00,000/-seized at the time of search along with up-to-date interest being due to the Petitioner pursuant to the ITAT order dated 09th May, 2022.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the ITAT vide order dated 09th May, 2022, decided all issues in favour of the Petitioner and the entire additions were deleted, thus allowing the appeal of the Pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top