SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ.
KRBL Limited - Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax - Respondent
W.P.(C) 14590 of 2022
Decided On : 19-10-2022




Timely compliance with statutory refund orders is imperative to protect taxpayer rights under the Income Tax Act and the Constitution.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 237, 240, 244A and 244A(1A) - Article 265 of the Constitution of India - Writ petition seeking directions for refund and appeal effect order - Respondents were required to issue refund of Rs.11,56,81,040/- along with interest as per ITAT order - Non-issuance of refund deemed a violation of law. (Paras 1-7)

(B) Appeal Effect Order - Timely compliance with orders issued by appellate authorities is mandated by law; failure to do so infringes upon the taxpayer's rights. (Paras 5-6)

Facts of the case:
The Petitioner sought directions from the Respondents to issue a refund and take action following the ITAT's order which favored the Petitioner and dismissed the Respondents' appeal. They experienced delay despite filing letters requesting action on the refund and appeal effect order.

Findings of Court:
The Court directed the Respondents to complete the necessary actions, including issuing refunds, within a specified period, emphasizing the legal obligation to act timely.

Issues: The main issues dealt with the Respondents' delay in processing the ITAT order and the entitlement of the Petitioner to refunds and interest.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Respondents had a legal duty to issue refund orders promptly under the Act; violations impede taxpayer rights and must be remedied swiftly.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with specific directions.

Table of Content
1. writ petition filed for income tax refund. (Para 1)
2. claim for refund based on itat order. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's view on time for appeal. (Para 4 , 5)
4. direction for refund processing. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J.:

C.M.No.44725/2022

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) No.14590/2022

1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondents to pass the appeal effect order pursuant to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (` ITAT') order dated 09th May, 2022 and to issue refund of Rs.11,56,81,040/-along with up-to-date interest as well as issue short interest of Rs.1,74,91,170/-received from the Respondents after giving effect to the order of CIT(A) for the Assessment Year 2010-11 and to release the refund of Rs. 60,00,000/-seized at the time of search along with up-to-date interest being due to the Petitioner pursuant to the ITAT order dated 09th May, 2022.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the ITAT vide order dated 09th May, 2022, decided all issues in favour of the Petitioner and the entire additions were deleted, thus allowing the appeal of the Petitioner and dismissing the appeal of the Respondents. He states that the Petitioner is now entitled to a refund of remaining taxes paid under protest amounting to Rs.11,56,81,040/-along with applicable interest under Sections 244A/244A(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act').

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner has filed letters dated 20th May, 2022 and 11th July, 2022 with the Respondents for passing of an appeal effect order pursuant to the ITAT order and also for release of refunds legally due to the Petitioner, but to no avail. He submits that non-issuance of refund is in violation of Article 265 of the Constitution of India and also against Sections 237 and 240 of the Act.

4. Issue notice. Mr.A.Renganath, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the Respondents-Revenue. He states that the Revenue is in the process of filing an appeal against the order of the ITAT.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the Respondents-Revenue had sufficient time to file an appeal against the order of the ITAT. In any event, in accordance with the mandate of law, the appeal effect order has to be passed within three months of passing the appeal order.

6. Keeping in view the limited prayer sought in the present writ petition, the same is disposed of along with the pending application with a direction to the Respondents-Revenue to consider:

(i) Issue of refund of Rs.11,56,81,040/-along with up-to-date interest to the Petitioner;

(ii) Issue of short interest payment of Rs.1,74,91,170/-to the Petitioner after giving effect to the order of CIT(A) for the Assessment Year 2010-11; and

(iii) Release of refund of Rs.60,00,000/-to the Petitioner, seized at the time of search along with up-to-date interest, in accordance with law.

7. The necessary appeal effect orders and payments of refunds shall be made within the said period of six weeks. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top