IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Mohan Prasad - Appellant
Versus
Employees State Insurance Corporation - Respondent
W.P.(C) 12490 of 2021
Decided On : 19-07-2022
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--Mr. Satyakam, ld. ASC for the GNCTD submits that a Selection Committee has been constituted for the purpose of appointment of members in respect of the vacant positions in the District and State Consumer Disputes Redressal Fora. He submits that further infrastructure has also been sought and the same is being coordinated with the concerned officials. He seeks four weeks' time to place the further status report on record.
2. Insofar as the infrastructure is concerned, the concerned officials of the Department of Consumer Affairs, GNCTD shall continue their interactions with the President, State Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, GNCTD, so as to ensure that the infrastructure is now put in place, before the next date of hearing.
3. Let the status report in this regard be now filed within four weeks. The same shall give details of the infrastructure provided and also inform the Court as to the status of the vacancies in the District and State Consumer Disputes Redressal Fora, including the staff.
4. Mr. Gaurav Jha, ld. Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, submits that the District Consumer Fora only sit for a limited amount of time between 11:30 am to 12:20 pm and between 12:20 pm to 1:10 p.m., as is evident from the cause list which has been shown to the Court.
5. Reference is made to Section 5 of the Consumer Protection Regulations, 2005 which provides hearing hours of the Consumer Fora. The same is extracted hereinbelow:
"5. Hearing hours.-Subject to the provisions of the rules, the normal working hours of the Consumer Forum for hearing matters shall be from 10.30 am to 1.00 p.m. and 2.00 p.m. to 4.00 p.m. on all working days of the Central Government in the case of the National Commission and on all working days of the State Government in the case of the State Commission and the District Forum"
6. The above regulation clearly shows that all Consumer Fora have to function between 10:30 am to 1:00 pm and 2:00 pm to 4:00 pm. Strict observance of the working hours, as prescribed under Regulation 5 extracted hereinabove is also envisaged in the Consumer Protection (Administrative Control Over the State Commission and the District Forum) Regulations, 2018, which has been extracted below:
"3. Observance of work.-(1) The State Commission and the District Forum shall list sufficient matters on each working day, to ensure that the work does not finish before the close of the hearing hours as prescribed in Regulation 5 of the Consumer Protection Regulations, 2005"
7. Mr. Jha, ld. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that apart from the hours provided for the video conferencing, in the cause list shown to the Court, the Consumer Forum does not sit beyond the timing as specified therein. This would be a cause for concern inasmuch as the link as per the said cause list shows the functioning of the District Consumer Fora, only from 11:30 am to 1:10 pm.
8. Considering the large pendency in the District Fora and the State Forum, it is urged that the President, State Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum shall look into this matter. The Consumer Forum(s) ought to function for the full working hours for hearing matters between 10:30 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. and from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., on a daily basis, as per the Regulations. A report be submitted by Ms. Sumanta Chakraborty, Registrar, Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, A-Block, Vikas Bhawan, I.P. Estate, New Delhi-110002 (T-011-23370799) before the next date of hearing, as to the status of the working hours, especially in the District Forum(s).
9. Copy of the present order be communicated to the Registrar, State Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum.
10. List on 6th September, 2022.
11. This is a part-heard matter.
Court emphasized strict adherence to operational hours for Consumer Fora to ensure efficient functioning and address case backlogs, mandating compliance with regulations.
The court emphasized the need to expedite the disposal of consumer complaints and address the backlog of cases in the Consumer Forum by filling up vacancies and providing necessary infrastructure.
Long delays in consumer complaint resolutions violate principles of effective justice, necessitating immediate infrastructural improvements and staffing in Consumer Fora.
The court emphasized the need for operational reforms in District Consumer Fora to enhance efficiency, prioritize case disposal, and ensure adequate infrastructure support.
Establishes framework for improving infrastructure and procedures in consumer dispute fora under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Court ordered prompt establishment of District Consumer Forum in Shahdara and improvement of infrastructure in Consumer Fora to ensure timely hearings and facilitate mediation under Consumer Protecti....
The court emphasized the need for expeditious adjudication of cases involving minors and highlighted the unjustifiable delay in the adjudication process, while also addressing concerns about the func....
The Court emphasized the critical need for timely appointments and operational infrastructure for consumer dispute redressal bodies, directing states to comply with the Consumer Protection Act requir....
Delays in hearing consumer complaints, especially involving minors, are unacceptable, necessitating expedient resolution by the Consumer Forum.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.