SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1365

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.
Chaman - Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors. - Respondent
CWP No.3646 of 2024
Decided On: 14-10-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rajender Singh, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, Mr. Rohit, Dy. Controller (F&A), Food Civil Supplies Department

Junior's pay under revised rules with 15% enhancement cannot exceed senior's; refixation at par upheld if due to incorrect option, but excess recovery quashed if departmental error.

Headnote:(A) Himachal Pradesh Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2022 - Rule 6 (exercise of option) and Rule 9 (stepping up of pay) - Office letter/instructions dated 10.02.2022 (paras 2, 3, 4(II)) - Pay fixation with 15% enhancement for employees appointed post 01.01.2016 - Junior employee exercised option from date of placement in higher scale described as promotion - Senior from date of completion of two years regular service - Junior's pay fixed higher - Pay of junior promoted/placed post 01.01.2016 cannot exceed immediate senior - Refixation of junior's pay at par with senior permissible - Rule 9 inapplicable as anomaly due to incorrect option - Recovery of excess impermissible if due to departmental error in acting on wrong option. (Paras 2(iv)-(viii), 3(i)-(ii), 4(i)-(ii), 5)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner aggrieved by order fixing pay at par with immediate senior w.e.f. date of senior's option and directing recovery of excess due to earlier wrong fixation. Both appointed as clerks on contract, regularized after five years, placed in higher pre-revised scale after two years regular service, later placed as junior assistants. Junior opted from placement date, senior from two-year completion date. Senior represented anomaly leading to refixation and recovery.

Findings of Court:
Impugned order upheld to extent of refixing pay at par with senior; direction for recovery quashed.

Issues: Whether junior's option from placement date valid; whether senior's pay to be stepped up under Rule 9; validity of refixation and recovery under office instructions.

Ratio Decidendi: Placement as junior assistant not promotion; junior's option incorrect - pay refixation at senior's level justified per para 4(II) to prevent junior drawing more; no senior-junior refixation benefit for senior; recovery not sustainable absent employee fault, being departmental lapse in processing incorrect option.

Result: Writ petition partly allowed.

Table of Content
1. wrong pay fixation entails recovery in equal installments. (Para 1)
2. junior pay aligned to senior's; rule 9 excludes option differences. (Para 2)
3. service progression from contract to regular and scale placements. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)

JUDGMENT :
Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J.

Petitioner feels aggrieved against the office order dated 16.02.2024 issued by the respondents fixing his pay at par with that of his immediate senior/respondent No.4 w.e.f. 21.10.2018 and thereby also ordering recovery of excess payment made to the petitioner due to alleged wrong fixation of his pay, in equal monthly installments.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the case file. I have also heard Mr. Rohit, Deputy Controller (Finance & Accounts) Department of Food & Civil Supplies, who has attended the hearing pursuant to the order passed in this case on 18.09.2025.

2. The case.

2(i) Petitioner was appointed as Clerk on contract basis on 14.09.2011. Respondent No.4, senior to the petitioner was appointed as Clerk on contract basis on 25.08.2011. Both were appointed in the pay scale of Rs. 5910+1900= 7810/-.

2(ii) On completion of five years of contractual service, petitioner was regularized as Clerk on 21.10.2016. Similarly, respondent No.4 was also regularized as Clerk of completion of five years on contract service.

2(iii) On completion of two years of service on the post of Clerk, petitioner and respondent No.4 were placed in pre-revised scale of Rs. 10300+3200=13500/-. Subsequently both of them were placed as Junior Assistants on 20.10.2021 in the pay-scale of Rs.11560/-+3600=15160/-.

2(iv) The Himachal Pradesh Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2022 ( REVISED PAY RULES 2022 in short) were notified on 03.01.2022. These rules came into force on and w.e.f. 01.01.2016.

Rule-6 thereof pertained to exercise of option by the government servant for coming over to the revised pay-scale. The option was to be exercised in the form appended with the rules within one month from the date of the notification of the rules.

Rule-6(4) stipulated that option once exercised, shall be final. The rule reads as under: -

6. Exercise of option. (1) The Government employee shall exercise option in the Form appended to these rules so as to reach the authority specified in sub-rule (2), within a period of one month from the date of notification of these rules:

Provided that:-

(i) in the case of a Government employee, who on the date of notification of these rules, is out of India or on leave or on deputation or on foreign service or on active service, the option shall be exercised in the said Form so as to reach the said authority within a period of one month from the date of his taking the charge of his post under the State Government, if that date is later than the date specified in this sub-rule; and(ii) where a Government employee is under suspension on the date of notification of these rules, the option shall be exercised within a period of one month from the date of his return to his duty, if that date is later than the date specified in this sub-rule.

(2) The option in the Form shall be submitted by the Government employee to the Head of the Office.

(3) If the option is not received within the time specified in sub-rule (I), the Government employee shall be deemed to have opted/ elected to be governed by the revised pay structure with effect from first day of january, 2016. The Head of the Office shall determine his pay in the revised pay structure with reference to provisions of rule 7 of these rules.

(4) The option once exercised shall be final.

Note 1. Persons, whose services were terminated on or after the first day of january, 2016 and who could not exercise their option within the specified period, on account of discharge on the expiry of the sanctioned posts, resignation, dismissal or discharge on disciplinary grounds, shall be entitled to the benefits under these rules, if otherwise admissible.

Note 2. Persons, who have died on or after the first day



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top