SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ.
MUFG Bank, Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 2(2)(1), International Taxation, Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 14586 of 2022
Decided On : 17-10-2022




Authorities must timely implement Tribunal decisions, ensuring compliance with statutory obligations, or face constitutional violations regarding due process.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 153(5), 244A(1), and 244(1A) - Writ petition seeking direction to pass order giving effect to the Tribunal's order dated 13th September 2019 regarding carry forward of losses for the Assessment Year 2000-01, which was neglected by the Respondent - Petitioner entitled to carry forward losses amounting to Rs. 38,73,42,584/- - Delay in issuing refund constitutes violation of Articles 265 and 300A of the Constitution. (Paras 1-4)

(B) Judicial Review - Courts can direct authorities to fulfill their statutory duties in a timely manner. (Para 6)

Facts of the case:
The writ petition was filed by a bank seeking a directive to the Income Tax Department to implement a prior decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding carry forward losses, which the department had failed to execute despite reminders from the Petitioner.

Findings of Court:
The Court directed the Respondents to issue the necessary orders regarding the computation of losses and the subsequent refund along with interest within eight weeks.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the Respondent's failure to comply with the Tribunal's order and the implications of withholding the refund.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that the Respondents must timely execute the Tribunal's order, as inaction constitutes a violation of constitutional rights concerning due process and timely resolution.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions to the Respondents.

Table of Content
1. right to carry forward losses under income tax act. (Para 1 , 2)
2. failure of respondents to comply with tribunal's order. (Para 3 , 4)
3. respondents are processing tribunal's order. (Para 5)
4. court's directive for compliance by respondents. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J.:

C.M.No.44719/2022

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 14586/2022

1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondents to pass the order giving effect to the order of the Income tax Appellate Tribunal (`Tribunal') dated 13th September 2019 as well as computing the losses for the Assessment Year 2000-01 to be carried forward to subsequent year(s) and pass the order for the Assessment Year 2005-06 setting off the losses and issue consequential refund along with interest under section 244A(1) and additional interest under section 244(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act').

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner is entitled to carry forward losses (including unabsorbed depreciation) amounting to Rs. 38,73,42,584/- for the Assessment Year 2000-01 to the subsequent year(s) by virtue of the relief given by the Tribunal vide order dated 13th September 2019. However, he states that the Respondent No.1 has failed to pass the order giving effect to the order of the Tribunal without giving any reason due to which the legitimate refund available to the Petitioner on account of losses to be carried forward to the subsequent years is blocked.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner vide emails dated 23rd April, 2021, 14th October, 2021, 24th December, 2021, 22nd February, 2022 and 20th May, 2022 reminded Respondent No.1 about passing the order giving effect to the order of the Tribunal and requested to re-compute the losses for the Assessment Year 2000-01 to be carried forward to subsequent year, but to no avail.

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner further states that the Respondents have grossly failed in their duty under law in not passing the order giving effect to the order of the Tribunal dated 13th September 2019 and issuing the refund as per the provisions of Section 153(5) of the Act and their action of withholding the refund is ex facie violative of Articles 265 and 300A of the Constitution of India.

5. Issue notice. Mr.Kunal Sharma, learned senior standing counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Respondents-Revenue. He states that the Assessing Officer is in the process of giving effect to the order of the Tribunal dated 13th September, 2019.

6. Keeping in view the aforesaid, present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondents-Revenue to pass the order giving effect to the order of the Tribunal dated 13th September, 2019 as well as computing the losses for the Assessment Year 2000-01 to be carried forward to subsequent year(s) and pass the order for the Assessment Year 2005-06 setting off the losses and issue the consequential refund, if any, along with interest under Section 244A(1) and additional interest under Section 244(1A) of the Act within eight weeks.

7. List for compliance on 10th January, 2023.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top