SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ.
Aricent Technologies (Holdings) Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax - Respondent
W.P.(C) 13994 of 2022
Decided On : 28-09-2022




A tribunal's unappealed order is final and mandates compliance, including refunding tax amounts per statutory provisions.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 240 and 244A - Writ petition seeking directions for appeal effect order following Tribunal's decision for Assessment Year 2013-14, which resulted in deletions of tax additions and entitlement to refund - Inaction by Respondents in granting refund found to contravene relevant statutory provisions. (Paras 1, 2, 3)

(B) Finality of tribunal's order - Court concluded that the tribunal's ruling was unappealed under Section 260A and therefore final, requiring compliance by the Respondents. (Paras 5, 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought directions for a tax refund due based on a Tribunal ruling deleting substantial tax additions that the Respondent could not contest further.

Findings of Court:
The court ordered that the Assessing Officer must implement the Tribunal's decision and process the refund within twelve weeks.

Issues: The core issues included whether the Respondents' failure to grant the refund violated statutory provisions concerning tax refunds.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the Tribunal's order had attained finality due to lack of appeal, mandating adherence by the Respondents.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions for compliance.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks refund based on tribunal's decision. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court observes finality of tribunal's order. (Para 5)
3. court directs issuance of refund and appeal effect order. (Para 6)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

C.M. No. 42831/2022

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 13994/2022

1. By way of the present writ petition, petitioner seeks directions to the Respondents to pass the appeal effect order of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the `Tribunal') for the Assessment Year 2013-14 and grant consequential refund of tax paid/deposited by the Petitioner along with applicable interest as per law.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Tribunal vide order dated 29th November, 2019 for Assessment Year 2013-14 deleted the additions/disallowances made by Respondent No.1 with respect to (i) transfer pricing addition on corporate charges of Rs.13,54,90,701/- and (ii) depreciation on goodwill of Rs.158,73,13,884/-, which includes additional depreciation of Rs.36,00,82,239/- which was not claimed in the tax return. He states that the Petitioner became entitled to total income tax refund(including interest) of Rs.23,18,71,243/-.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that as per the information available with the Petitioner, the order passed by the Tribunal has not been further assailed in appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act') before this Court by the Revenue. He states that despite this, no refund has been issued to the Petitioner in contravention of Section 240 and Section 244A of the Act.

4. Issue notice. Mr.Sanjay Kumar, learned senior standing counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Respondents-Revenue. He states that he has no instructions in the present case.

5. This Court is of the view that as the order of the Tribunal has not been assailed in appeal under Section 260A of the Act, it has attained finality and the inaction of the Respondents in granting the refund is in contravention of Sections 240 and 244A of the Act.

6. Consequently, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Assessing Officer to pass the appeal effect order of the order passed by the Tribunal for the Assessment Years 2013-14 within twelve weeks of receipt of this order as well as grant, if any, the consequential refund of tax paid/deposited by the Petitioner along with applicable interest in accordance with law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top