IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ.
Aricent Technologies (Holdings) Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax - Respondent
W.P.(C) 13994 of 2022
Decided On : 28-09-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks refund based on tribunal's decision. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court observes finality of tribunal's order. (Para 5) |
| 3. court directs issuance of refund and appeal effect order. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)
C.M. No. 42831/2022
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 13994/2022
1. By way of the present writ petition, petitioner seeks directions to the Respondents to pass the appeal effect order of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the `Tribunal') for the Assessment Year 2013-14 and grant consequential refund of tax paid/deposited by the Petitioner along with applicable interest as per law.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Tribunal vide order dated 29th November, 2019 for Assessment Year 2013-14 deleted the additions/disallowances made by Respondent No.1 with respect to (i) transfer pricing addition on corporate charges of Rs.13,54,90,701/- and (ii) depreciation on goodwill of Rs.158,73,13,884/-, which includes additional depreciation of Rs.36,00,82,239/- which was not claimed in the tax return. He states that the Petitioner became entitled to total income tax refund(including interest) of Rs.23,18,71,243/-.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that as per the information available with the Petitioner, the order passed by the Tribunal has not been further assailed in appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act') before this Court by the Revenue. He states that despite this, no refund has been issued to the Petitioner in contravention of Section 240 and Section 244A of the Act.
4. Issue notice. Mr.Sanjay Kumar, learned senior standing counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Respondents-Revenue. He states that he has no instructions in the present case.
5. This Court is of the view that as the order of the Tribunal has not been assailed in appeal under Section 260A of the Act, it has attained finality and the inaction of the Respondents in granting the refund is in contravention of Sections 240 and 244A of the Act.
6. Consequently, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Assessing Officer to pass the appeal effect order of the order passed by the Tribunal for the Assessment Years 2013-14 within twelve weeks of receipt of this order as well as grant, if any, the consequential refund of tax paid/deposited by the Petitioner along with applicable interest in accordance with law.
A tribunal's unappealed order is final and mandates compliance, including refunding tax amounts per statutory provisions.
The Court mandated the issuance of tax refunds and appeal effect orders according to the ITAT ruling, emphasizing the importance of timely compliance within stipulated periods.
Timely issuance of refunds as per the Income Tax Act is mandatory to prevent financial prejudice to the taxpayer, emphasizing the obligation of tax authorities to comply with tribunal orders.
Authorities must timely implement Tribunal decisions, ensuring compliance with statutory obligations, or face constitutional violations regarding due process.
The court affirmed the Respondents' obligation to act promptly on ITAT orders regarding refunds and applicable interest under the Income Tax Act.
The court has the authority to direct the Respondent to pass appeal effect orders and grant refunds in accordance with law.
The court held that the Revenue must issue a tax refund following favorable ITAT rulings, emphasizing performance within statutory timelines to comply with legal obligations.
Timely compliance with statutory refund orders is imperative to protect taxpayer rights under the Income Tax Act and the Constitution.
The absence of an order under Section 241A of the Income Tax Act obligates the revenue to release due refund amounts to the petitioner.
Revenue authorities must implement binding orders from ITAT within a reasonable time frame, ensuring the timely processing of TDS credits and refunds under Article 265.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.