Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Aricent Technologies (Holdings) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks refund based on tribunal's decision. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court observes finality of tribunal's order. (Para 5) |
| 3. court directs issuance of refund and appeal effect order. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)
C.M. No. 42831/2022
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 13994/2022
1. By way of the present writ petition, petitioner seeks directions to the Respondents to pass the appeal effect order of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the `Tribunal') for the Assessment Year 2013-14 and grant consequential refund of tax paid/deposited by the Petitioner along with applicable interest as per law.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Tribunal vide order dated 29th November, 2019 for Assessment Year 2013-14 deleted the additions/disallowances made by Respondent No.1 with respect to (i) transfer pricing addition on corporate charges of Rs.13,54,90,701/- and (ii) depreciation on goodwill of Rs.158,73,13,884/-, which includes additional depreciation of Rs.36,00,82,239/- which was not claimed in the tax return. He states that the Petitioner becam
A tribunal's unappealed order is final and mandates compliance, including refunding tax amounts per statutory provisions.
The Court mandated the issuance of tax refunds and appeal effect orders according to the ITAT ruling, emphasizing the importance of timely compliance within stipulated periods.
Timely issuance of refunds as per the Income Tax Act is mandatory to prevent financial prejudice to the taxpayer, emphasizing the obligation of tax authorities to comply with tribunal orders.
Authorities must timely implement Tribunal decisions, ensuring compliance with statutory obligations, or face constitutional violations regarding due process.
The court affirmed the Respondents' obligation to act promptly on ITAT orders regarding refunds and applicable interest under the Income Tax Act.
The court has the authority to direct the Respondent to pass appeal effect orders and grant refunds in accordance with law.
The court held that the Revenue must issue a tax refund following favorable ITAT rulings, emphasizing performance within statutory timelines to comply with legal obligations.
Timely compliance with statutory refund orders is imperative to protect taxpayer rights under the Income Tax Act and the Constitution.
The absence of an order under Section 241A of the Income Tax Act obligates the revenue to release due refund amounts to the petitioner.
Revenue authorities must implement binding orders from ITAT within a reasonable time frame, ensuring the timely processing of TDS credits and refunds under Article 265.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
