Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
S.P. Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the facts and context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. tribunal's decision context. (Para 4) |
| 3. petitioners' arguments on discrimination. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. importance of probation and its implications. (Para 10 , 11 , 17) |
| 5. substantive appointment and seniority calculation. (Para 18 , 19 , 31) |
| 6. treatment of promotees and direct recruits under rules. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 7. substantive vacancies and seniority from appointment date. (Para 30 , 32) |
| 8. final conclusion and case resolution. (Para 34 , 35) |
JUDGMENT
Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J. The present writ petition is arising out of order dated 07.07.2008 passed in O.A. No. 1063/2007 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi. The Petitioners have prayed for quashment of seniority list dated 18.09.2006/23.11.2006 of the Assistants. The facts of the case reveal that the substantive vacancies for the post of Assistant in the Armed Forces Headquarters (hereinafter referred as "the Department") were meant to be filled by two categories of appointees namely - direct recruits (Also referred as "DRs") and departmental promotees (Also referred as "DPs"). While preparing the seniority list of assistants in the dep
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
