SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
HC/Steward Gulshan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. court directs decision on pending representations (Para 1 , 2 , 5)
2. need for promotion based on supreme court judgment (Para 3 , 4)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

CM APPL. 52630/2022

1. Exemption is allowed subject to filing of fair typed copies of dim annexures and documents with appropriate margins within four weeks.

2. The application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 16693/2022

3. The prayers are as under:

    "3. To Direct the Respondents to amend the Recruitment Rules to the effect that promotional posts are created for the Petitioners in the spirit of judgment rendered by the Supreme Court of India in Appeal (Civil) No. 6253 of 1998 titled as State of Tripura & Ors. V. Sri K.K. Roy, reported in (2004) 9 SCC 65 ratio of which has been followed in judgment dated 27.01.2017 passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Tripura in WP(C) No. 199 of 2011 titled as `Shri Asok Bhattacharya vs. The State of Tripura';

    4. To Direct the Respondents to hold DPC and promote the Petitioners on the promotional posts so created by the Respondents;"

4. Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made representation dated 11.01.2021. However, till date final decision has not been taken

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top