SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5060

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Arjun Singh & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 7412 of 2023
Decided On : 26-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh and Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocates, for the Petitioners.
Mr. Neeraj Kumar Central Govt. Counsel with Mr. Kabir Kumar Hazarika G.P. and Mr. Anshul Bhadouria, Advocate and Sh. Hemendra Singh DC, Law, BSF, for the Respondents.

The court clarified the legal position and directed the extension of benefits to similarly situated candidates.

Headnote:

Exemption - Writ Petition - The court directed the respondents to extend the benefit given in previous petitions to the petitioners in the present petition if they are similarly situated candidates.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought the extension of benefits given in previous judgments to similarly situated candidates.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the respondents to extend the benefits to the petitioners if they are similarly situated candidates and allowed the petitioner to submit correct information to the respondents for decision.

Issues: Extension of benefits to similarly situated candidates, submission of correct information by the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: The legal position was clarified, and the court directed the respondents to extend benefits to similarly situated candidates and allowed the petitioner to submit correct information for decision.

Final Decision: The petition is accordingly disposed of with the direction to the respondents to extend the benefits to similarly situated candidates and allow the petitioner to submit correct information for decision.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

CM APPL. 28854/2023 (Seeking Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2. The application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 7412/2023

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioners are similarly situated and cover in the judgment rendered by this Court in W.P. (C) 3343/2023 and W.P.(C) 3453/2023.

4. We note that while rejecting the representation of the petitioners it is mentioned in paragraph 4 that the said judgment is applicable only to those petitioners who are party in the Writ Petitions, but that is not the legal position.

5. Accordingly, we hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to extend the benefit given in the above said petitions to the petitioners in the present petition also if they are similarly situated candidates.

6. To this effect necessary order shall be passed by the respondents within six weeks from now.

7. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that some incorrect details are mentioned in the petition. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to submit the correct information to the respondents within one week and thereafter, the respondents shall take decision within six weeks.

8. The petition is accordingly disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top