SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Vinod Sehgal – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (ORAL)

1. Present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner seeking quashing of the impugned Office Order dated 19.12.2018 as well as issuance of writ of mandamus to the Respondent to refund the payment wrongly deducted from the retirement benefits with interest @ 12% per annum. Writ of mandamus is also sought for re-fixation of his pension on the basis of pay drawn on 30.11.2018, in terms of Order dated 28.01.2016.

2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the factual score of the case, to the extent relevant to decide the issue arising in the writ petition, is that Petitioner was working as Assistant Engineer with the Respondent when departmental proceedings were initiated against him and a penalty was imposed on 09.08.2012. Relevant part of the penalty order is as follows:

    "reduction to lower stage in present scale of pay by two stages for a period of three years with direction that the officer will not earn increments of pay during the period of this reduction to the lower stage and on the expiry of such period the reduction will not have the effect of postponing of the further increment of his pay."

3. However, the Appellate Authority, vide order da

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top