Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Anil Kshetarpal, Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
Smt Reeta Jha – Appellant
Versus
Mukund Kumar Jha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction of appeal under family courts act. (Para 1) |
| 2. concealment of medical condition affecting marriage. (Para 2 , 14) |
| 3. credibility of testimonies and contradictions. (Para 3 , 15) |
| 4. definition of fraud under section 12(1)(c) hma. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 5. material fact in marital fraud context. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 6. deliberate concealment impacts on consent. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 7. validity of consent based on full disclosure. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. overall conclusion on annulment of marriage. (Para 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT :
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR J.
1. The present appeal under Section 19(1)(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is preferred against the Judgment and Decree dated 05.11.2024, [Impugned Judgement.] by which the learned Principal Judge, Family Courts, Tis Hazari Courts (West), Delhi, [District Judge.], has declared the marriage as between the parties herein as null and void under Section 12(1)(c) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, [Act.]
2. The solitary challenge in this Appeal, as urged on behalf of the Appellant, is that the provisions of Section 12(1)(c) of the Act are not applicable to the present
The concealment of a material fact concerning a spouse's ability to conceive constitutes fraud under Section 12(1)(c) of the Hindu Marriage Act, rendering the marriage voidable.
Concealment of prior marriage and misrepresentation of income constitute fraud under Section 12(1)(c) of the Hindu Marriage Act, voiding the marriage due to compromised consent.
Marriage under Hindu law is not voidable based on misrepresentation of health unless consent was not given freely; real consent is paramount.
Concealment of a prior marriage constitutes fraud under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act, justifying annulment of the subsequent marriage.
The court reaffirmed that to annul a marriage on grounds of fraud, the burden of proof lies on the appellant to demonstrate concealment of facts; failure to provide personal testimony results in adve....
Failure to prove serious mental illness or fraud in marriage annulment under Hindu Marriage Act, emphasizing strict evidentiary standards.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a real consent to the solemnization of marriage and the limited scope of 'fraud' under Hindu Law in the context of annulment of....
Cohabitation after discovering fraud constitutes condonation, barring annulment under Hindu Marriage Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
