Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TEJAS KARIA
Star Sintered Products Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Karan Bhutani Trading As M/S Kmsp Industries – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of rectification petitions and appellant's rights. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. claims of improper service and lack of notice. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. respondent's assertions about service and representation. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. arguments of appellant regarding participation and service. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 5. respondent's denial of appellant's claims. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 6. court's analysis on procedural fairness and appropriate service. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 7. final ruling and order on appeals. (Para 41 , 42) |
JUDGMENT :
TEJAS KARIA, J.
IA No.48849/2024 in O.A. 223/2024 in C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 63/2024, IA No. 48832/2024 in O.A. 219/2024 in C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 64/2024, IA No.48833/2024 in O.A. 220/2024 in C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 65/2024, IA No.48834/2024 in O.A. 221/2024 in C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 66/2024 & IA No.48848/2024 in O.A. 222/2024 in C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 67/2024 (All for condonation of delay in filing the Appeals).
1. For the reasons stated in the Applications, the same are allowed.
2. The Applications are disposed of.
O.A. 223/2024 in C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 63/2024, O.A. 219/2024 in C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 64/2024, O.
Procedural fairness mandates proper service of summons before closing a party's right to file a response in rectification proceedings, highlighting the necessity for courts to act in a manner that do....
(1) Adjudicate on merits – Primary function of consumer forums is to adjudicate on merits.(2) Ex-parte decision – An ex-parte decision regarding manufacturing defects is legally fragile if the manufa....
Trademark rectification petitions require a triable issue on validity to proceed; without this, claims are not maintainable under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Condonation of delay is an equitable remedy requiring bona fide conduct. It cannot be granted when a litigant engages in tactical 'fence-sitting,' deliberately concealing the pendency of proceedings,....
The Registrar of Trade Marks cannot condone delay in review applications beyond the period prescribed by Trade Marks Rules, affirming adherence to statutory timelines.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
