Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JASMEET SINGH
Bijender Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. arguments against the impugned order. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 21) |
| 3. court's observations on the investigation. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 4. importance of administrative enquiry for public servants. (Para 38 , 39 , 48) |
| 5. conclusion and order to set aside the impugned order. (Para 78 , 79 , 80) |
JUDGMENT :
JASMEET SINGH, J.
1. This instant appeal is filed under section 14A of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 ('SC/ST Act') read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('Cr.P.C.') challenging the order dated 29.02.2020 ('impugned order') passed by the learned ASJ-02, Special Judge [SC/ST Act] (South-West) Dwarka Court, Delhi wherein application filed by the respondent no. 2/complainant under section 4 read with section 3(2) (vi) and (vii) of SC/ST Act and under Section 217 and 218 of INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 ( 'IPC') against the appellant was allowed and the learned special court directed to lodge the first information report ('FIR') against the appellant.
BRIEF BACKGROUND
2. A complaint was made by the complainant against the Constable Ra
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
