SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 846

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BALWAN SINGH AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

VIBHU BAKHRU, J.

1. The petitioners have filed the present petition impugning an order dated 16.08.2024 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by respondent no.2 (hereafter LAC), whereby the application preferred by the petitioners under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereafter the LA Act) was dismissed on the ground of limitation.

2. The petitioners also pray that directions be issued to the respondents to pay compensation to the petitioners at the rate of Rs. 26.6 lacs per acre (Rs. 5,52,083.33 per bigha) along with interest as awarded by the Court of the learned Additional District Judge (ADJ) in terms of the order dated 11.11.2016.

3. The principal question that falls for consideration of this court is whether the application filed by the petitioners under Section 28A of the LA Act was barred by limitation.

BRIEF FACTS

4. The petitioners claim that they owned land/had interest in land (hereafter the subject land) located in the revenue estate of village Chhawala.

5. The Notification under Section 4 of the LA Act for acquisition of certain lands including the subject land in the revenue estate of village Chhawala, for public purposes namely construction of 100

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top