SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 846

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BALWAN SINGH AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenges to land acquisition compensation process. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. petitioners seek enhanced compensation. (Para 2 , 3 , 8)
3. argument on limitation due to lack of knowledge. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. lac's counter-arguments to petitioners' claims. (Para 12 , 13)
5. interpretation of section 28a of the la act. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
6. limitations on filing applications under section 28a. (Para 17 , 18 , 19)
7. clarification on who qualifies for notice in compensation applications. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
8. rejection of the petition based on limitation. (Para 28 , 29)
9. possible future applications under section 28a. (Para 30 , 31 , 32)
10. final dismissal of petition. (Para 33)

JUDGMENT :

VIBHU BAKHRU, J.

1. The petitioners have filed the present petition impugning an order dated 16.08.2024 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by respondent no.2 (hereafter LAC), whereby the application preferred by the petitioners under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereafter the LA Act) was dismissed on the ground of limitation.

2. The petitioners also pray that directions be issued to the respondents to pay compensation to the petitioners at

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top