IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.
M/S Paisalo Digital Limited (Formerly Known As S. E. Investments Limited) – Petitioner
Versus
M/S Sun Corp & Ors. – Respondent
ARB.P. 1022 of 2025
Decided On : 27-02-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for arbitrator appointment. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding arbitration notice validity. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. court reviews previous decisions and limitations. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. judicial discretion limited to arbitration agreement’s existence. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. arbitrator appointed, with costs and rights reserved. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT :
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.
1. The present Petition, filed under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 , Act seeks appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for the purpose of resolution of disputes that are stated to have arisen inter se the parties arising out of the Clause 20 as set out inHypothecation/Loan Agreement dated 02.03.2015. The said clause reads as follows:
“20. Any conflict, difference, controversies, or disputes arising between the parties, if not resolved mutually, shall be submitted/referred to the arbitration of the Sole Arbitrator. The notices like Demand Notice, Loan Recall - cum - Demand Notice and/or telephonic conversations/ mails shall be deemed to be sufficient proof for opportunity given to the Borrower and/ or Guarantor(s) for resolving the issues and efforts of Amicable Settlement made by the Company.
The Borrower and Guarantor (s) hereby agree and give their free consent to the Company i.e. SEIL to appoint I nominate any person/ professional as Sole Arbitrator without any prior consent or reference to them. Such rights of appointing an arbitrator are not questionable by the Borrower and /or the Guarantor (s). The notice for Appointment of Arbitrator and the Statement of Claims can be forwarded by the Company i.e. SEIL on the same day to the Arbitrator and the Borrower as well as the Guarantor(s) so as to facilitate early disposal of Arbitration proceedings.
The parties to this agreement agree for the following procedure regarding Arbitration Proceedings:-
a) The Statement of Claims will be forwarded by the Company i.e. SE IL along with all documents relied upon by the Company i.e. SEIL.
b) The Borrower and Guarantor (s) shall file their reply along with all the documents relied upon within 15 days of receiving of Statement of Claim or such other period as may specified by the Arbitrator.
c) The Company i.e. SEIL shall file rejoinder/ replication, if any, within 7 days or such other period as may be specified by the Arbitrator along with further documents. if required.
d) Sole Arbitrator will frame issues i.e. points of controversies between the parties.
e) Thereafter the Parties will file their Affidavit in Evidence in 7 Days along with further documents, if any.
f)Thereafter the parties will file their written submissions/arguments in 10 days.
g) If any party files any Application then the above proceedings will be followed without prejudice to their rights of that Application.
h) Hearing will be held on weekly basis or as the Sole Arbitrator think fit and proper.
i) The Arbitration Case would be decided on documentary evidence and Affidavits of parties and no verbal submissions shall be taken on record.
j) The Sole Arbitrator may decide the other procedural aspects and may change the above schedule if he/she thinks proper. Any notice/ document pursuant hereto shall be deemed to be duly served if sent by Registered Post/ Speed Post at addresses as mentioned in this Agreement or to any changed address if such change has been notified by either party hereto and such notice shall be deemed to take effect on third working day following the date of posting thereof. The parties have agreed that documents and correspondence may be served by fax or email and it shall be considered sufficient proof of delivery of documents.
The Parties have also agreed that in case of multiple loan transactions in which all or any of the Borrower and Guarantor(s) are same or belong to same group or family then the Company i.e. SEIL at its sole discretion, may initiate single Arbitration Proceedings for multiple l
SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Krish Spinning
Interplay Between Arbitration Agreements under Arbitration Act, 1996 & Stamp Act, 1899, In re
The court held that its review under Section 11(6) is limited to confirming the existence of an arbitration agreement, without delving into substantive disputes, which is for the Arbitrator to decide....
The court confirmed that a prima facie arbitration agreement exists under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, limiting judicial scrutiny to the agreement's existence, deferring sub....
Judicial scrutiny under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act is limited to the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, with substantive issues reserved for the arbitral tribunal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.