SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH, RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner - II – Appellant
Versus
Puranmal Ghasiram Bhavsar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. B.B. Pradhan, Advocate

ORDER

The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner against the order dated 09.01.2019 of Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ahmedabad (for short “the State Commission”) in First Appeal No.1221/2010, whereby the Appeal filed by the Respondent/Complainant was allowed.

2. Alongwith the Revision Petition, IA/1000/2022, an application for condonation of delay has also been filed by the Petitioner. According to the Petitioner, there is a delay of 922 days in filing the Revision Petition. However, according to the computation done by the Registry, there is a delay of 1022 days.

3. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner on IA/1000/2022, application for condonation of delay and also carefully perused the record.

4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the after receiving the order passed from the State Commission, the Petitioner sought legal opinion from its panel lawyer on 25.01.2019. Thereafter, Zonal Office, Ahmedabad, vide letter dated 08.01.2020, advised the Nodal Office, Delhi to file the Revision Petition. The said approval was issued on 16.01.2020 but the Petition was not filed due to pandemic. It is stated in the application t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top