Back
AVM J. RAJENDRA
Aptech Ltd. Through Its Company Secretary – Appellant
Versus
Prem Lata Bansal – Respondent
ORDER
As per the records of the Registry, there is 413 days delay in filing these Revision Petitions. The Petitioner filed IA Nos.6424 of 2020 and 6439 of 2020 respectively seeking condonation of delay. In the said IAs, the Petitioner has stated that the Revision Petitions have been filed against the order of the Delhi State Commission dated 07.06.2019 in FA Nos. 298 of 2014 and 299 of 2014 with a delay of 210 days. The Petitioner contends that the filing of the present Revision Petitions incurred a delay attributable to the subsequent misplacement of the free copy of the order dated 07.06.2019, necessitating its retrieval for submission to the Legal Department for the purpose of initiating an Appeal / Revision Petition against the order of the learned State Commission. Subsequently, the Petitioner sought the engagement of local counsel in Delhi for filing of these Revision Petitions before this Commission, and the entire case files forwarded to the said counsel in December 2019. However, the office of the local counsel was closed due to winter vacation, delaying the procurement of certified copies until January 2020. Thereafter, the local counsel commenced drafting of these Revisi
‘Sufficient Cause’ means that the party should not have acted in a negligent manner or there was a want of bona fide on its part & applicant must satisfy that he was prevented by any “sufficient caus....
(1) Each day’s delay - The petitioner failed to explain or show sufficient reason for delay of each day as required under the law. In the instant case, the cause shown for delay that the issue pertai....
“Sufficient Cause”- ‘sufficient cause’ means that the party should not have acted in a negligent manner or there was a want of bona fide on its part and that the applicant must satisfy that he was pr....
(1) Protracted delay - The petitioner failed to show sufficient reason for delay of each day as required under the law. In the instant case, the cause shown for delay that the issue pertains to the d....
1. Limitation - Limitation has to be applied with all its rigour when the statute so prescribes, though it may harshly affect a particular party. 2. Condonation of delay - Condonation of delay is not....
Condonation of delay is not a matter of right and the applicant has to set out the care showing sufficient cause which prevented them to come to the commission.
(1) Where case has been presented in court beyond limitation, applicant has to explain the court as to what was the “sufficient cause” which prevented him to approach court within limitation.(2) When....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
