SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J. RAJENDRA
Bajaj Allianz General Ins. Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sunita Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Satwik Parikh, Advocate

ORDER (ORAL)

As per the record of the Registry, there is a delay of 255 days in filing of this Revision Petition. IA No.11469 of 2023 has been filed by the petitioner seeking condonation of the said delay. As per the petitioner, the impugned order was passed on 12.09.2022. Thereafter, the local counsel of the petitioner at Lucknow applied for a certified copy of the Impugned order and the same was received by the local counsel on 22.09.2022.

2. He handed over the impugned order to his clerk for delivering at the office of the petitioner at Lucknow. The said clerk, due to oversight, did not hand over the same and after sometime the said clerk fell ill. Thus, the certified copy of the impugned Judgment/ Order was provided at the Petitioner’s office at Lucknow only on 19.04.2023. Thereafter, the Petitioner’s company consulted their Advocates in Delhi and discussed the further course of action. The process of identifying and consulting Advocates took some time. Upon receiving legal opinions, the Petitioner decided to challenge the Impugned Judgment/Order before the NCDRC. Accordingly, the Revision Petition was assigned to the present Advocates for filing and progressing before the NCDR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top