Back
J. RAJENDRA
Greaves Cotton Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Uma Associates – Respondent
ORDER (ORAL)
As per the record of the Registry, there is a delay of 191 days in filing of this Revision Petition. However, IA No.12324 of 2023 has been filed by the petitioner seeking condonation of delay for 196 days. The petitioner averred in the said IA that the impugned order was passed on 08.12.2022. Thereafter, the Petitioner-Company, upon receiving the copy of order dated 08.12.2022, deliberated upon the matter and decided to question its correctness. In January 2023, the Petitioner engaged a lawyer for drafting and filing of the revision petition before the NCDRC. In furtherance of the same, the records of the case and certified copy of the order were supplied to the lawyer. During February-March 2023, some changes occurred in the internal management of the Petitioner Company, including the change of the then Manager (Legal) Mr. Prabal Dixit with Ms Richa Pachori, incumbent Manager (Legal). The change of personnel in internal management of the Petitioner-Company led to consolidating data, status of ongoing litigations of the Petitioner Company. In the middle of this transition, the officials of the Petitioner-Company could not follow up with the lawyer about the status of d
(1) Protracted delay - The petitioner failed to show sufficient reason for delay of each day as required under the law. In the instant case, the cause shown for delay that the issue pertains to the d....
“Sufficient Cause”- ‘sufficient cause’ means that the party should not have acted in a negligent manner or there was a want of bona fide on its part and that the applicant must satisfy that he was pr....
(1) Each day’s delay - The petitioner failed to explain or show sufficient reason for delay of each day as required under the law. In the instant case, the cause shown for delay that the issue pertai....
‘Sufficient Cause’ means that the party should not have acted in a negligent manner or there was a want of bona fide on its part & applicant must satisfy that he was prevented by any “sufficient caus....
Condonation of delay is not a matter of right and the applicant has to set out the care showing sufficient cause which prevented them to come to the commission.
1. Limitation - Limitation has to be applied with all its rigour when the statute so prescribes, though it may harshly affect a particular party. 2. Condonation of delay - Condonation of delay is not....
(1) Where case has been presented in court beyond limitation, applicant has to explain the court as to what was the “sufficient cause” which prevented him to approach court within limitation.(2) When....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
