SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PINKI
Arjun Chandele – Appellant
Versus
Nitishree Infrastructure Ltd. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Praveen Mahajan and Mr. Brajesh Jha, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Sangita Dhingra Sehgal (President)—The present complaint has been filed by the Complainant before this commission alleging deficiency of service on the part of the Opposite Parties and has prayed the following reliefs:—

(a) Directing the opposite party to refund the amount of Rs.6,26,007.00 (Rupees six lacs twenty six thousand and seven only) already paid by the complaint to the opposite party, together with interest @24% per annum from the date of payment by the Complainant till its realization.

(b) Compensation/damages of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lacs Only) in favour of the Complainant and against the opposite party, for the inconvenience, harassment and mental agony and pain suffered by the Complainant because of the unwarranted, arbitrary and whimsical act and conduct of the opposite party.

(c) Interest on the compensation @ 24% per annum till realization of the compensation.

(d) The cost of the present proceedings in favour of the Complainant and against the opposite party: and

(e) Such other/further order (s) as this Hon’ble Forum may deem fit and proper in the fact and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the Complainant.

2. Brief fact

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top