SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MANOJIT MANDAL, SAMIKSHA BHATTACHARYA
Ruma Baksi – Appellant
Versus
Dharitri Infraventure Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


ORDER

Manojit Mandal, President—The instant complaint under section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ( in short ‘the Act’) is at the instance of the complainant against the Opposite parties on the allegation of deficiency of services on the part of the Opposite parties in a consumer dispute of housing construction.

2. The facts of the complaint case in short is that Opposite party No. 1 is the Private Limited Company. The Opposite parties No. 2 & 3 are the representatives of the Opposite party No. 1 Company. The Opposite parties were going to construct a housing complex known as ‘Royal Enclave’, comprising the flat Units, car parking space, commercial spaces, Duplex Bungalow etc. at mouza Hatishala, J.L. No. 9, R.S. No. 31, Touzi No. 2999, comprised in R.S. Dag No. 1288, appertaining to R.S. Khatian No. 652 in the District of South 24 Parganas.

3. The complainant wanted to purchase a residential flat and for which she and the Opposite parties entered into an agreement / Memorandum of Understanding on 25/01/2016.

4. It was agreed that the complainant will purchase one 2 BHK flat having super built up area of 750 sq. ft. more or less. In this agreement dated 25/01/2016 it was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top