Back
RAVISHANKAR, SUNITA C. BAGEWADI
Manager Pragathi Krishna Gramin Bank – Appellant
Versus
Tayavva W/o Basappa Gulagannavar – Respondent
ORDER
Sunita C. Bagewadi, Member—The Appellant/OP-1 filed these eleven (11) appeals being aggrieved by the order dated 21.05.2018 passed by Koppal District Consumer Commission in C.C.No.69/2017 to 79/2017 respectively which allowed the complaints filed by the complainants.
2. The brief facts of the cases are that, all the complainants have alleged that they have availed a crop insurance policy during the year 2016-2017 under “Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bhima Yojana” from Opposite Party No.2 through the Opposite Party No.1 bank for Maize crop on the date and receipt shown in Col.No.5 and has paid the premium as shown in Col. No.6. All the complainants have paid the premiums as per their sowing area in their lands. During that year there was shortfall in the yield of crop due to scanty rainfall. The Opposite Party No.1 received the crop insurance premium from these complainants on different dates for Maize crop and after entering the data into the computer, they have approved the same and also they sent the premium to the Opposite Party No.2 insurance company. But the Opposite Party No
Mistake in Data - For the mistake in data, Appellant Bank is liable for compensation.
Mistake in Data - For the mistake in data, Appellant Bank is liable for compensation.
Banks under PMFBY are accountable for accurate reporting of insured details, with liability for misreporting leading to claim denials.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
