Baidyanath Mondal VS Kanahaya Lal Rathi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

C. VISWANATH
Baidyanath Mondal – Appellant
Versus
Kanahaya Lal Rathi – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sahej Uban, Advocate with Petitioner in Person
For the Respondent No.3: Mr. Kanhaiya Lal Rathi, In Person
For the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: AR

ORDER

C. Viswanath, Presiding Member.—The present Revision Petition is filed by the Petitioner under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against Order passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal, Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) in Appeal No.463/2014 dated 19.07.2016 whereby the Appeal filed by the Complainant was dismissed.

2. The Revision Petition has been filed with a delay of 116 days. For the reasons stated in the application and in the interest of justice, the delay is condoned.

3. Case of the Complainant/Petitioner is that he purchased 2000 equity shares of Aravinda Remedies and 200 equity shares of Reliance Power Ltd. by making payment of Rs.13,700 and Rs.49,400/- respectively. The Opposite Party delivered 1000 shares of Aravinda Remedies instead of 2000 shares amounting to Rs.6,850/- leaving a refundable amount of Rs.6,850/-. Further, the Opposite Party delivered 200 shares of Reliance Power Ltd. amounting to Rs.47,440/- leaving a refundable amount of Rs.1,960/-. When the Complainant enquired about his Demat Account, he came to know that 200 shares of Reliance Power Ltd. were transferred to the account o