SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DINESH SINGH, KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE
Afcons Developers Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Brijlal Menghraj Ahuja – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Ms. Deepika Mishra, Advocate with Mr. Narendra Dubey, Advocate
For the Respondent in FA/814/2020:Mr. Satish Muley, Advocate with Mr. Pawan Kumar Ray, Advocate
For the Respondent in FA/815/2020, FA/816/2020 and FA/817/2020:Mr. Manoj P. Mhatre, Advocate
For the Respondent in FA/818/2020:Mr. Satish Muley, Advocate with Mr. Pawan Kumar Ray, Advocate
For the Respondent in FA/819/2020: NEMO
For the Respondent in FA/820/2020, FA/821/2020, FA/822/2020, FA/823/2020, FA/824/2020, FA/825/2020, FA/826/2020, FA/827/2020:Mr. Manoj P. Mhatre, Advocate
For the Respondent in FA/828/2020:Mr. Satish Muley, Advocate with Mr. Pawan Kumar Ray, Advocate
For the Respondent in FA/829/2020, FA/830/2020, FA/831/2020, FA/832/2020, FA/833/2020:Mr. Manoj P. Mhatre, Advocate
For the Respondent in FA/834/2020:Mr. Satish Muley, Advocate with Mr. Pawan Kumar Ray, Advocate
For the Respondent in FA/835/2020, FA/836/2020:Mr. Manoj P. Mhatre, Advocate
For the Respondent in FA/837/2020, FA/838/2020, FA/839/2020:Mr. Satish Muley, Advocate with Mr. Pawan Kumar Ray, Advocate
For the Respondent in FA/840/2020:Mr. Manoj P. Mhatre, Advocate

ORDER

Karuna Nand Bajpayee, Member—These twenty seven (27) appeals, no. 814, no. 815, no. 816, no. 817, no. 818, no. 819, no. 820, no. 821, no. 822, no. 823, no. 824, no. 825, no. 826, no. 827, no. 828, no. 829, no. 830, no. 831, no. 832, no. 833, no. 834, no. 835, no. 836, no. 837, no. 838, no. 839 and no. 840 of 2020, have been filed under section 19 of The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 in challenge to the Orders (27 nos.) dated 28.11.2019 of the State Commission in complaints no. 560, no. 561, no. 562, no. 563, no. 564, no. 565, no. 566, no. 567, no. 568, no. 569 of 2014, no. 278, no. 279, no. 280, no. 281, no. 282, no. 283, no. 284, no. 285, no. 286, no. 287 of 2015, no. 462 of 2015, no. 930, no. 932, no. 933, no. 934, no. 935 and no. 936 of 2016 respectively.

Ms. Deepika Mishra, learned counsel appeared for the appellant (the ‘builder co.’) in all twenty seven (27) appeals.

Mr. Manoj P. Mhatre, learned counsel appeared for the respondents (the ‘complainants’) in all appeals except appeals no. 814, no. 818, no. 828, no. 834, no. 837, no. 838 and no. 839 of 2020.

Mr. Satish Muley and Mr. Pawan Kumar Ray, learned counsel appeared for the respondents (the ‘complainants’) in appeal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top