SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R. K. AGRAWAL, BINOY KUMAR
Rekha Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vikas Jain, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. Amrreeta Swaarup, Advocate

ORDER

The present Revision Petitions have been filed under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, challenging the Impugned Order dated 15.05.2017 passed by the Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as State Commission) in Appeal Nos. 614 & 615 of 2013, whereby the State Commission by setting aside the Order dated 22.05.2013 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bhilwara (for short “the District Forum”) dismissing the Complaint Nos. 163 & 164 / 2012 filed by the Complainant, allowed the Appeals filed by the Complainant by directing the Opposite Party Oriental Insurance Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Respondent Insurance Company) to pay the loss assessed by the Surveyor to Complainant within 30 days.

2. Brief facts of the case as mentioned in Complaint No. 163 / 2012 are that the Complainant obtained GCCV Public Carriers Other than Three Wheelers Package Policy No. 242400/31/2011/5618 for Vehicle bearing Registration No. RJ-06-GB-2781 from the Respondent Insurance Company for IDV value of Rs.20,00,000/-. During the currency of the Policy, vehicle met with an accident. Insurance Company was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top