SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

INDER JIT SINGH, SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kamaljit Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Updip Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Dr. Sudhir Kumar Jain, Member.—Briefly stated relevant facts of the case are that the respondent/the complainant/Kamaljit Singh (hereinafter referred to as “the respondent””) is the registered owner of the truck bearing registration no PBO7 BQ 1136 (hereinafter referred to as “the vehicle”). The respondent was plying said vehicle for his self-employment and livelihood. The vehicle was insured with the petitioner No. l /opposite party No. 1 /the Oriental Insurance Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as “the petitioner No. 1”) through the petitioner no 2 vide insurance policy number 242596/31/2019/TMC/26889 dated 21.07.2018 which was valid for the period from 21.07.2018, to 20.07.2019. The respondent paid the premium regularly. The vehicle in the month of January 2019 met with an accident in the State of Madhya Pradesh. The respondent informed about the incident promptly intimated to the petitioner No. 2 and submitted requisite documents. The petitioner No. 2 submitted their report but no Daily Diary Report (DDR) or First Information Report (FIR) was registered with regard to accident by the local police as the accident involved only the overturning of the vehicle and no

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top