SUDIP AHLUWALIA, INDER JIT SINGH
Shivani – Appellant
Versus
Managing Director Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER
Dr. Inder Jit Singh, Member—The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondents as detailed above, under section 21 of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 04.08.2017 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No.997 of 2013 in which order dated 30.03.2013 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Indore (hereinafter referred to as District Commission) in Consumer Complaint (CC) no 1143 of 2009 was challenged, inter alia praying for setting aside the order dated 04.08.2017 passed by the State Commission.
2. While the Revision Petitioner(s) (hereinafter also referred to as Petitioner/Complainant) was Respondent, the Respondent(s) (hereinafter also referred to as OPs) were Appellants in the said FA 997/2013 before the State Commission. The Revision Petitioner was Complainant and Respondent(s) were OPs before the District Commission in the CC no 1143 of 2009. Notice was issued to the Respondent(s) herein on 24.11.2017. Notice to Respondent No. 3 was received back undelivered with postal remarks ‘Refused”. Hence
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.