SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUBHASH CHANDRA, J. RAJENDRA
Sushila Singh – Appellant
Versus
Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. Meenakshi Midha, Advocate with Mr. Garv Singh, Advocate

ORDER

AVM J. Rajendra, AVSM, VSM (Retd.), Member—The present First Appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) against the Order dated 08.10.2018 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bihar (hereinafter referred as “the State Commission”), in Consumer Complaint No.21 of 2017, wherein the Complaint filed by the Complainant (Appellant herein) was dismissed.

2. For the sake of Convenience, the parties in the present matter being referred to as mentioned in the Complaint before the State Commission. “Mrs. Sushila Singh” is identified as the Complainant who is wife and nominee of the insured policy holder Late Shri Sanjay Kumar (Since deceased). “The Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd. & Others” are referred to as the Opposite Parties or Insurer in this matter.

3. There was 26 days delay in filing the present Appeal. For the reasons stated in IA/23780/2018, vide Order dated 26.09.2022, the delay was condoned.

4. Brief relevant facts of the case as per the Complainant are that the Husband of the Appellant/Complainant (‘Insured’ for short) obtained a Life Insurance Policy (Dream Endowment Plan), vid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top