SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

INDER JIT SINGH
Force Motors Limited – Appellant
Versus
Ravindran – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vijay Valsan, Advocate
For the Respondents: Nemo

ORDER

The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondent(s) as detailed above, under section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 22.01.2016 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No. 395/2013 in which order dated 18.03.2013, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Palakkad (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) no. 144/2011 was challenged, inter alia praying to set aside the impugned order passed by the State Commission.

2. While the Revision Petitioner (hereinafter also referred to as OP-1) was Appellant before the State Commission and OP-1 before the District Forum; the Respondent-1 (hereinafter also referred to as complainant) was Respondent-1 before the State Commission and Complainant before the District Forum and the Respondent-2 (hereinafter also referred to as OP-2) was Respondent-2 before the State Commission and OP-2 before the District Forum. For sake of convenience, parties may also be referred to as they were arrayed before the District Forum.

3. Notice was i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top