Back
SUBHASH CHANDRA, SADHNA SHANKER
Mahboob Alam Qureshi – Appellant
Versus
TDI Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER
Dr. Sadhna Shanker, Member.—The present appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short ‘the Act’) by Mr. Mahboob Alam Qureshi and Mr. Javed Alam Qureshi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘complainants’) assailing the Order dated 01.05.2017 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’) in complaint No. 1129 of 2015 whereby the complaint was dismissed as barred by limitation.
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellants (hereinafter referred to as the ‘complainants’) and the learned counsel for the respondent (hereinafter referred to as the ‘builder company’) and perused the memorandum of appeal.
3. There is a delay of 21 days in filing the present appeal.
In the interest of justice and considering the reasons mentioned in the application for condonation of delay, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
4. The facts, in brief, are that the complainants booked a plot measuring 350 sq. yds. in Future Township Project TDI City and deposited a sum of Rs.5,42,500/-, being 20% of basic price, by cheque dated 27.08.2005 and opted for option-II whereby the compla
(1) Delay - The delay of each and every day has to be explained.(2) Due Diligence - The basic test to determine whether the delay is reasonable or whether the party has been acting with due diligence....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
