Back
J. RAJENDRA
Yogendra Prasad Singh (Dead) – Appellant
Versus
Estate Officer, Chhattisgarh Housing Board – Respondent
ORDER
These two Revision Petitions No.1523 and 1524 of 2022 have been filed under Section 58(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (‘the Act’) by the Petitioner/Complainant against the impugned orders dated 22.07.2022, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chhattisgarh (State Commission) in FA Nos. 149 and 151 of 2021 respectively. Vide Order dated 22.07.2022, the State Commission dismissed the said Appeals of the Petitioner/ Complainant and affirmed the Orders dated 25.09.2021 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Jashpur (“District Forum”) in Consumer Complaint Nos.CC/2020/05 & CC/2020/06 respectively wherein both the complaints filed by the Petitioner/ Complainant were dismissed.
2. Since the facts and questions of law involved in both the Revision Petitions are substantially similar, except for minor variations in dates and events, both the petitions are being disposed of by this common Order. For ease of reference, R.P. No.1523 of 2022 shall be considered as the lead case, and the facts presented below are drawn from Consumer Complaint No.CC/2020/05.
3. For convenience, the parties are being referred to as placed in the original C
Revisional jurisdiction - Where two interpretations of evidence are possible, concurrent findings based on evidence have to be accepted and such findings cannot be substituted in revisional jurisdict....
“Refund of amount deposited for non-delivery of possession of subject-units out of Builder-Buyer Agreement, upheld.”
1) Cancellation of the Residential House by the Petitioner, instead of correction of defect in the building and further allotment of the same to the third party, certainly amounts to deficiency in se....
No revision petition against the order passed in appeal filed under section 27-A of Act is maintainable before national commission.
Limited Jurisdiction – Commission’s revisional Jurisdiction is limited. Since there were concurrent findings of fact regarding the deficiency of service by both lower courts, and no jurisdictional er....
The National Commission emphasized its limited revisional jurisdiction, requiring clear jurisdictional errors for interfering with concurrent findings of fact from lower forums.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
