SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KUMKUM RANI, B. S. MANRAL
Rakhi Mahendra – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Traders and Contractors – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Sh. Sudhanshu Dwivedi, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Sh. Deepak Ahluwalia, Advocate

ORDER

Kumkum Rani, President.—Disposal of Preliminary Objections (paper No. 35) filed by the opposite party regarding maintainability of consumer complaint.

Preliminary objection (paper No. 35) alongwith affidavit has been submitted on behalf of the opposite party alleging that in para No. 5 of the complaint case the complainant has alleged agreement for sale dated 26.02.2011 is not sufficiently stamped and not registered as per provisions of the Registration Act, hence the said agreement is not admissible and enforceable and on the basis of unregistered and insufficiently stamped agreement, the complainant has no legal right to enforce the same for execution of the sale deed under law, hence the said complaint is not legally maintainable. It is further alleged in the preliminary objection that the alleged dispute under the complaint is regarding enforcement of the agreement for which suit for specific performance of the agreement is maintainable. But to frustrate the mandatory provisions of the Indian Stamp Act, Indian Registration Act, Court Fees Act and Specific Relief Act the present complaint is being filed. In the present matter, there is no deficiency in service, therefore,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top