Saurabh Pal VS S. S. Enterprise

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

AJEYA MATILAL, NITYASUNDAR TRIVEDI
Saurabh Pal – Appellant
Versus
S. S. Enterprise – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Avijit Bhuina, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Ashok Kr. Roy, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ajeya Matilal, Presiding Member.—Ld. Counsel for the Complainant is present.

Opposite Parties are found absent on

call.

Today is fixed for final hearing.

2. This is the case U/s.17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 valued at Rs.41,27,900/- (Rupees Forty one Lakh twenty seven thousand & nine hundred) only.

3. The fact of the case is in short like that the Opposite Party No.1 is a Partnership Firm represented by Opposite Party No.2 & 3. This was the instant case of the Complainant. The Opposite Party is carrying on business of construction and development from its office. The Opposite Party Nos.4 to 8 are the land owners who have given consent in favour of the Opposite Party Nos.1 to 3 to erect or construct a multistoried building on the

scheduled flat. The Opposite Party Nos.4 to 8 executed a power of attorney in favour of Opposite Party Nos.2 & 3 for entering into Sale Agreement with prospective purchaser to transfer flat to be constructed on the aforesaid plot of land. It was further agreed therein in the said development Agreement /Joint Venture Agreement dated 04.05.2011 that the Developer may enter into separate Agreement/agreements with the intending Purchaser/purc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document