SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KUMKUM RANI, B. S. MANRAL
PNB Met Life India Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Poonam Gambhir – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Sh. Vijay Pal Tiwari and Sh. Rajesh Kumar Devliyal, Advocates
For the Respondents:Sh. Vikrant Gambhir, Advocate

ORDER

Kumkum Rani, President.—This appeal under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 29.10.2022 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haridwar (in short “The District Commission”) in consumer complaint No. 186 of 2020; Smt. Poonam Gambhir Vs. Branch Manager, PNB MetLife India Insurance Company Limited and others, by which the consumer complaint was allowed and PNB MetLife Loan & Life Suraksha Certificate of Insurance (Level Cover) bearing Group Policy Holder – Punjab National Bank; Group Policy No. 00000653; Application No. 677131668; Certificate No. 22497445 and period of coverage as 10.03.2018 to 10.03.2026 issued by the appellants – insurance company, was cancelled, with a further direction to the appellants and respondent No. 2, who were opposite parties to the consumer complaint before the District Commission, to refund the premium amount of Rs.11,76,190.96/- deducted from the account of respondent No. 1 – complainant, together with interest @6% p.a. from 09.09.2020, i.e., the date of institution of the consumer complaint till payment, besides to pay Rs.10,000/- towards compens

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top