Back
A. P. SAHI, INDER JIT SINGH
Kummari Suguna – Appellant
Versus
Manager, Agent of United India Insurance Company Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER
Dr. Inder Jit Singh, Member.—The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondents as detailed above, under section 58 (a) of Consumer Protection Act 2019, against the order dated 12.09.2022 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Andhra Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No.71 of 2019 in which order dated 03.01.2019 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kurnool (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) No.42 of 2017 was challenged, inter alia praying for setting aside the order dated 12.09.2022 of the State Commission.
2. While the Revision Petitioner (hereinafter also referred to as Complainant) was Appellant before the State Commission and Complainant before the District Forum and the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 (hereinafter also referred to as Opposite Party Nos.1 & 2 respectively) were Respondent Nos.1 & 2 before the State Commission and Opposite Party Nos.1 & 2 before the District Forum.
3. Notice was issued to the Respondent(s) on 21.04.2023. Parties filed Written Arguments on 04.10.2023 (Petitioner), 03.05.2024 (Respondent No. 1) and 15.12.2023 (
Utilization of amount deducted exclusively for obtaining Home Safe Plus Merchant Policy, for other purpose without complainants’ consent or knowledge amounts to deficiency in service on part of bank.
Revision under Section 21(b) of Act, 1986 confers very limited jurisdiction on National Commission.
(1) National commission - The power of National Commission to review under section 21 of the Act is therefore, limited to cases where some prima facie error appears in the impugned order.(2) Revision....
(1) Insurance coverage taken for security of the loan amt.; therefore, it should commence from the date of the disbursement of the loan amt., i.e., on 21.01.2017.(2) Respondent’s deceased husband was....
Policy coverage provisions should be interpreted broadly regarding tripartite agreement along with the terms of the policy and exclusion clause must be read narrowly.
The principal is liable for the agent’s fraud within their authority, despite claims of misrepresentation.
(1) Revision – It is a well settled position in law that the scope for Revision under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and now under Section 58(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act,....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
