SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE, SADHNA SHANKER
Piyush Priyadarshan Dash – Appellant
Versus
Kanhu Charan Naik – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Aditya Narayan Tripathy, Advocate (in PH)

ORDER

This revision petition has been filed in challenge to the Order dated 24.05.2024 in appeal no.277 of 2024 of the State Commission Orissa.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record including inter alia the Orders passed by the Fora below and the memo of petition.

3. It appears that a complaint was made before the District Commission. The complaint was allowed by the District Commission and the following award was made therein which reads as follows:-

The case of the complainant is allowed ex parte against the O.P. The O.P is hereby directed to restrain himself from such unfair trade practice with immediate effect and not to charge any extra amount other than the MRP as reflected in the price list as well as to the label of the bottle. As mentioned by the complainant, the O.P used to sell 5000 number of Bira Boom beer bottle per month which goes to show that in the meanwhile through the said illegal process, the O.P had infact amassed illegal wealth and thereby had caused gross financial loss to the people at large who were consumers at his shop but are unidentifiable now. As per the provisions of Sec-39(K) of the C.P.Act, 2019, this unfair trade pra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top