Back
MANOJIT MANDAL
Sudip Das – Appellant
Versus
DLF Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manojit Mandal, President.—By filing this complaint the complainants have prayed for the following reliefs by admitting the complaint:—
“a) Direct the Opposite Parties No.1 and 2 to refund an amount of Rs.18,25,700/- (Rupees Eighteen Lakh Twenty-Five Thousand and Seven Hundred) only on account of the cost of repairing work done by the Complainants, maintenance charges paid, value of stolen articles and other miscellaneous expenses incurred, within a stipulated period of time to be framed by this Learned Commission;
b) Pass an order directing the Opposite Parties No.1 and 2 to refund the money to the Complainants forthwith along with interests @12% till the date of full and final satisfaction of the amount so given;
c) Pass an order directing the Opposite Parties No.1 and 2 to pay a sum of Rs.65,00,000/- (Rupees Sixty Five Lakh) only as and by way of compensation;
d) Pass an order directing the Opposite Parties No.1 and 2 to pay a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) as litigation costs;
e) Pass an order directing the Opposite Party No.1 to take effective steps immediately for executing and registering the Deed of Conveyance of the Flat No.NRF141 on the 14th Flo
Pecuniary Jurisdiction of Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission under CP Act, 2019 is determined solely by the value of consideration paid for goods or services & not by value of goods or services t....
Pecuniary jurisdiction – For the purpose of determining pecuniary jurisdiction under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, only the value of the consideration paid for goods or services should be consid....
Joint Complaint – Need for application of Order I Rule 8 of CPC would be required only in a case involving a complaint under Section 12(1)(c) of 1986 Act – It does not have any application when simil....
Complicated questions – Nothing cogent has been brought on record by the Opposite Parties which would reflect that there are such complicated questions involved which could not be settled on the basi....
The jurisdiction of the District Consumer Redressal Commission is determined by the value of goods or services with respect to specific deficiencies claimed, not by the total transaction value.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
