SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S. P. TAVADE, VIJAY C. PREMCHANDANI
Sanvo Resorts Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Hitesh Tejnani – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:S.B. Prabhavalkar, Advocate
For the Respondent: In person

JUDGMENT

Vijay C. Premchandani, Member.—The present appellants ( Original Opponent ) filed this appeal, being aggrieved by Judgment and Order dated 28.04.22 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Central Mumbai at Parel, in Consumer Complaint No.94/2020 filed by the Respondent ( Original Complainant ), thereby partly allowing the said Consumer Complaint and holding that the Appellant is guilty of adopting Deficiency in Services and unfair trade practices towards the Respondent while providing construction services to the Respondent and to pay an amount of Rs.12,03,296/- to gather with SI interest @18% p.a. from 01.02.2014 till realization, Rs.1,00,000/- as and by way of compensation towards mental agony suffered by the Respondent and Rs.25,000/- towards costs of litigation, with further directions to pay the said amount within 30 days from the receipt of the Order, failing which the said amount will attract SI @ 24% instead of 18% p.a.

Facts of the Complaint.

2. In the month of December 1013, Complainant and his wife Ritika Tejnani signed the Reservation Booking form and booked Flat No.2303 in the Building known as Marathon Nexzone Acruz situated at Village K

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top