Amit Sharma VS Union of India, North Western Railway

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SUBHASH CHANDRA, J. RAJENDRA
Amit Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, North Western Railway – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Krishan Gopal Khatri, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Varma, Advocate

ORDER

AVM J. Rajendra, AVSM, VSM (Retd.), Member—This Revision Petition is filed under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (the “Act”) against the Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur(‘State Commission’) order dated 08.11.2016 in FA Nos. 424 and 439 of 2015, wherein the FA No. 439/2015 filed by the Complainant was dismissed and FA No.424 filed by UOI was allowed and District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ajmer (“District Forum”) order in CC No. 52/2013 dated 17.03.2015 was set aside.

2. As per report of the Registry, there is a delay of one day in filing the present Revision Petition. In view of the facts and circumstances, the delay is condoned.

3. For convenience, the parties are referred to as stated in the original Complaint before District Forum. Amit Sharma is referred to as Complainant (Petitioner herein) and Union of India is referred to as the Opposite Party (OP) No.1 (Respondent No.1) and Divisional Rail Manager is denoted as OP-2 (Respondent No.2) respectively.

4. Brief facts of the case, as per the Complainant, are that he along with his family travelled by Pooja Express from Delhi to Ajmer in AC Coach No. B-2, with reserved